CMAJ • July 5, 2005; 173 (1). doi:10.1503/cmaj.1041444.
© 2005 CMA Media Inc. or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graham, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Graham, M. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ischemic heart disease
Right arrowRelated Articles


Research
Recherche

Population rates of cardiac catheterization and yield of high-risk coronary artery disease

Michelle M. Graham, William A. Ghali, Peter D. Faris, P. Diane Galbraith, Jack V. Tu, Colleen M. Norris, Ali Zentner, Merril L. Knudtson for the APPROACH Investigators

From the Departments of Medicine (Graham) and Faculty of Nursing (Norris), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; the Departments of Medicine (Ghali), Cardiovascular Sciences (Knudtson) and Community Health Sciences (Ghali, Faris, Galbraith), and the Centre for Health and Policy Studies (Ghali), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, and the Departments of Medicine and Public Health Sciences (Tu), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; the Chinook Health Region (Zentner), Lethbridge, Alta.; and the Calgary office of the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) (Galbraith).
Merril Knudtson is the principal investigator of APPROACH.
APPROACH Clinical Steering Committee Edmonton: Stephen Archer, Michelle M. Graham, William Hui, Arvind Koshal, Colleen M. Norris and Ross T. Tsuyuki (chair); Calgary: Michael J. Curtis, P. Diane Galbraith, William A. Ghali, Merril L. Knudtson, Andrew Maitland, L. Brent Mitchell and Dean Traboulsi

Correspondence to: Dr. Michelle M. Graham, Division of Cardiology, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440–112 St., Edmonton AB T6G 2R7; fax 780 407-1496; mmgraham{at}cha.ab.ca

Background: The optimal population rate of cardiac catheterization is unknown. One potential way to determine it would be to examine whether there is a population rate beyond which the yield of high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD) does not rise.

Methods: Using a detailed clinical registry that captures all patients undergoing cardiac catheterization in Alberta, we determined annual population rates of cardiac catheterization and the corresponding yield of cases of high-risk CAD in each of Alberta's 17 health regions from 1995 to 2002. Least squares linear regression analysis and hierarchical modelling methods were then used to assess the linear relation between catheterization rates and rates of high-risk CAD.

Results: The age-adjusted average rate of cardiac catheterization among men ranged from 404.9 to 638.1 per 100 000 population aged over 20 years. Among women, the average rate ranged from 171.8 to 314.0 per 100 000. For both sexes, increased regional rates of catheterization were associated with a linearly increasing yield of high-risk CAD, with no evidence of a plateau in yield when more procedures were performed. One additional case of high-risk CAD was identified for every 2.5 additional cardiac catheterization procedures performed among men, and for every 3.7 additional procedures performed among women.

Interpretation: The increasing yield of patients with high-risk CAD associated with increased regional population rates of cardiac catheterization, together with the absence of a plateau in yield, suggests that Alberta's population rates of cardiac catheterization are suboptimal to detect people with high-risk CAD.



Related Articles

Determining optimal population rates of cardiac catheterization: A phantom alternative?
Madhu K. Natarajan, Amiram Gafni, and Salim Yusuf
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2005 173: 49-52. [Full Text] [PDF]

Highlights of this issue
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2005 173: 9. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. H. Lee, M. Tan, A. T. Yan, R. T. Yan, D. Fitchett, E. A. Grima, A. Langer, S. G. Goodman, and for the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) Re
Use of Cardiac Catheterization for Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes According to Initial Risk: Reasons Why Physicians Choose Not to Refer Their Patients
Arch Intern Med, February 11, 2008; 168(3): 291 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. M. Singh, P. C. Austin, A. Chong, and D. A. Alter
Coronary Angiography Following Acute Myocardial Infarction in Ontario, Canada
Arch Intern Med, April 23, 2007; 167(8): 808 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
M. Letic
Determining optimal catheterization rates
Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 31, 2006; 174(3): 349 - 349.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
M. K. Natarajan, A. Gafni, and S. Yusuf
Determining optimal population rates of cardiac catheterization: A phantom alternative?
Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 5, 2005; 173(1): 49 - 52.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Catheterisation rates
Milorad Letic
CMAJ, 10 Aug 2005 [Full text]