 Advertisement | ||||||||
 | ||||||||
|
||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
|
From the School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. (Soon); the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia (Soon, Levine, Osmond, Ensom, Fielding); the Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia (Levine); the College of Pharmacists of British Columbia (Osmond); and the Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia (Ensom), Vancouver, BC
Correspondence to: Dr. Judith A. Soon, Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2146 East Mall, Vancouver BC V6T 1Z3; fax 604 859-4345; jsoon{at}interchange.ubc.ca
Background: Timely access to emergency contraception has the potential to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies and subsequent abortions. A public health policy initiative in British Columbia beginning in December 2000 allowed pharmacists to provide emergency contraceptives (ECs) without a prescription. We sought to determine changes in EC use after the policy was introduced and to analyze EC use with data generated by the policy.
Methods: All Ovral, Preven and Plan B EC prescriptions from Jan. 1, 1996, to Dec. 31, 2003, were identified through the BC PharmaNet and Medical Services Plan administrative databases and the data analyzed to determine changes between 1996 and 2002. Changes over time were determined in the frequency of EC provision, choice of EC agent, frequency of EC use by age group, repeat use and geographic distribution of EC prescription for the pre- and post-policy periods. Anonymized patient-specific data from treatment consent forms were used to describe the reason for EC use, interval between unprotected intercourse and EC prescription, proportion prescribed for immediate or future use, referrals for regular birth control and STD screening and concomitant antiemetic use. Consent data also provided the time in the menstrual cycle that the EC was requested.
Results: The number of EC prescriptions increased from a pre-policy mean of 8805 (99% confidence interval 7823–9787) in the years 1996 to 2000 to a post-policy total in 2002 of 17 794. Physicians prescribed the levonorgestrel regimen (Plan B) less frequently than did pharmacists. The frequency of EC use was highest among women aged 20–24 years across all study years, and all age groups demonstrated a post-policy increase in use. On average, 2.1% of the women received an EC 3 or more times a year over the period of the study. More women in urban regions received ECs than women in more rural areas of the province. Analysis of pharmacist treatment consent forms used in 2001 and 2002 showed that 56.2% of women receiving an EC reported using a method of birth control that had failed, 55.7% of pharmacist-provided ECs were obtained within 24 hours after unprotected intercourse, 1.1% of ECs were obtained for future use, antiemetics were provided to 57.7% of women receiving the Yuzpe regimen (Ovral, Preven) and to 20.5% of women receiving levonorgestrel, and women tended to seek ECs when unprotected intercourse occurred at the time of highest risk of pregnancy in their menstrual cycle. Women in greatest financial need obtained ECs more frequently from physicians than from pharmacists.
Interpretation: The policy change that granted pharmacists authority to provide ECs to women without a physician's prescription did not simply expand EC availability but was associated with an overall increase in EC use in the province.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Kachroo Misinformation about emergency contraception Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., June 1, 2007; 64(11): 1137 - 1142. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Murray Privacy issues and Plan B: the Canadian Pharmacists Association responds Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 3, 2006; 174(1): 64 - 65. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. D. Lynd, J. Taylor, R. Dobson, and D. J. Willison Prescription to over-the-counter deregulation in Canada: Are we ready for it, or do we need to be? Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 27, 2005; 173(7): 775 - 777. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Cantin Emergency contraception Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 13, 2005; 173(6): 578 - 578. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Farnham Emergency contraception Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 13, 2005; 173(6): 575 - 575. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emergency contraception moves behind the counter Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 29, 2005; 172(7): 845 - 845. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
La contraception d'urgence derriere le comptoir Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 29, 2005; 172(7): 847 - 847. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all eLetters
| HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | HELP | SEARCH |
|
|||||
|
Copyright 1995-2005, Canadian Medical Association. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329
(e) 0820-3946 (p)
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association. |
|||||
