Advertisement
ADVANCED SEARCH

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) [Online Appendix] Submit a response View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dionne, C. E. Articles by Larocque, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dionne, C. E. Articles by Larocque, I. Related Collections Other rehabilitation medicine Occupational Health Related Article

A clinical return-to-work rule for patients with back pain

From Unité de recherche en santé des populations, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier affilié universitaire de Québec (Dionne, Larocque); the Local Community Health Care Center (CLSC) Haute-Ville-des-Rivières, Quebec City, Que. (Bourbonnais); Département de réadaptation, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Que. (Dionne, Bourbonnais, Frémont); Département d'épidémiologie, de biostatistique et de santé au travail, Université McGill, and Régie régionale de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal-centre, Montréal, Que. (Rossignol, Stock); and Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Montréal, Que. (Stock).

Correspondence to: Dr. Clermont E. Dionne, Unité de recherche en santé des populations, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier affilié universitaire de Québec, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, 1050, chemin Ste-Foy, Québec QC G1S 4L8; fax 418 682-7949; clermont.dionne{at}uresp.ulaval.ca

Background: Tools for early identification of workers with back pain who are at high risk of adverse occupational outcome would help concentrate clinical attention on the patients who need it most, while helping reduce unnecessary interventions (and costs) among the others. This study was conducted to develop and validate clinical rules to predict the 2-year work disability status of people consulting for nonspecific back pain in primary care settings.

Methods: This was a 2-year prospective cohort study conducted in 7 primary care settings in the Quebec City area. The study enrolled 1007 workers (participation, 68.4% of potential participants expected to be eligible) aged 18–64 years who consulted for nonspecific back pain associated with at least 1 day's absence from work. The majority (86%) completed 5 telephone interviews documenting a large array of variables. Clinical information was abstracted from the medical files. The outcome measure was "return to work in good health" at 2 years, a variable that combined patients' occupational status, functional limitations and recurrences of work absence. Predictive models of 2-year outcome were developed with a recursive partitioning approach on a 40% random sample of our study subjects, then validated on the rest.

Results: The best predictive model included 7 baseline variables (patient's recovery expectations, radiating pain, previous back surgery, pain intensity, frequent change of position because of back pain, irritability and bad temper, and difficulty sleeping) and was particularly efficient at identifying patients with no adverse occupational outcome (negative predictive value 78%– 94%).

Interpretation: A clinical prediction rule accurately identified a large proportion of workers with back pain consulting in a primary care setting who were at a low risk of an adverse occupational outcome.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S Derrett, J Langley, B Hokowhitu, S Ameratunga, P Hansen, G Davie, E Wyeth, and R Lilley Prospective outcomes of injury study Inj. Prev., October 1, 2009; 15(5): e3 - e3. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M Beneciuk, M. D Bishop, and S. Z George Clinical Prediction Rules for Physical Therapy Interventions: A Systematic Review Physical Therapy, February 1, 2009; 89(2): 114 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R A Iles, M Davidson, and N F Taylor Psychosocial predictors of failure to return to work in non-chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2008; 65(8): 507 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A Browder, J. D Childs, J. A Cleland, and J. M Fritz Effectiveness of an Extension-Oriented Treatment Approach in a Subgroup of Subjects With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial Physical Therapy, December 1, 2007; 87(12): 1608 - 1618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. F Beattie and R. M Nelson Evaluating Research Studies That Address Prognosis for Patients Receiving Physical Therapy Care: A Clinical Update Physical Therapy, November 1, 2007; 87(11): 1527 - 1535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Donner-Banzhoff, T. Roth, A. C Sonnichsen, J. Luckmann, C. Leonhardt, J.-F Chenot, A. Becker, S. Keller, F. Griffiths, and E. Baum Evaluating the accuracy of a simple heuristic to identify serious causes of low back pain Fam. Pract., December 1, 2006; 23(6): 682 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. T Evans and N. M Hadler An algorithm comprising 7 baseline variables predicted the 2 year work disability status in non-specific back pain Evid. Based Med., December 1, 2005; 10(6): 187 - 187. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Maher Clinical prediction rule for return to work after back pain Can. Med. Assoc. J., June 7, 2005; 172(12): 1575 - 1576. [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

HOME	CURRENT ISSUE	PAST ISSUES	COLLECTIONS	HELP	SEARCH
Copyright 1995-2005, Canadian Medical Association. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p) All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.