|
From the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (Bhandari, Busse, Jackowski, Montori, Schünemann, Sprague, Mears, Heels-Ansdell, Devereaux); and the Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Schemitsch).
Correspondence to: Dr. Mohit Bhandari, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Medical Centre, 1200 Main St. W, Rm. 2C3, Hamilton ON L8N 3Z5; fax 905 524-3841; bhandari{at}sympatico.ca
Background: Conflicting reports exist in the medical literature regarding the association between industry funding and published research findings. In this study, we examine the association between industry funding and the statistical significance of results in recently published medical and surgical trials.
Methods: We examined a consecutive series of 332 randomized trials published between January 1999 and June 2001 in 8 leading surgical journals and 5 medical journals. Each eligible study was independently reviewed for methodological quality using a 21-point index with 5 domains: randomization, outcomes, eligibility criteria, interventions and statistical issues. Our primary analysis included studies that explicitly identified the primary outcome and reported it as statistically significant. For studies that did not explicitly identify a primary outcome, we defined a "positive" study as one with at least 1 statistically significant outcome measure. We used multivariable regression analysis to determine whether there was an association between reported industry funding and trial results, while controlling for study quality and sample size.
Results: Among the 332 randomized trials, there were 158 drug trials, 87 surgical trials and 87 trials of other therapies. In 122 (37%) of the trials, authors declared industry funding. An unadjusted analysis of this sample of trials revealed that industry funding was associated with a statistically significant result in favour of the new industry product (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33.5). The association remained significant after adjustment for study quality and sample size (adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.13.0). There was a nonsignificant difference between surgical trials (OR 8.0, 95% CI 1.153.2) and drug trials (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.12.8), both of which were likely to have a pro-industry result (relative OR 5.0, 95% CI 0.737.5, p = 0.14).
Interpretation: Industry-funded trials are more likely to be associated with statistically significant pro-industry findings, both in medical trials and surgical interventions.
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. J. MAXWELL and J. A. SINGH Abatacept for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cochrane Systematic Review J Rheumatol, February 1, 2010; 37(2): 234 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Benjamin Jr, P. B. Smith, M. J. M. Sun, M. D. Murphy, D. Avant, L. Mathis, W. Rodriguez, R. M. Califf, and J. S. Li Safety and Transparency of Pediatric Drug Trials Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 2009; 163(12): 1080 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Okike, M. S. Kocher, E. X. Wei, C. T. Mehlman, and M. Bhandari Accuracy of Conflict-of-Interest Disclosures Reported by Physicians N. Engl. J. Med., October 8, 2009; 361(15): 1466 - 1474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Greenland Accounting for uncertainty about investigator bias: disclosure is informative: How could disclosure of interests work better in medicine, epidemiology and public health? J Epidemiol Community Health, August 1, 2009; 63(8): 593 - 598. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Irwin The Role of Conflict of Interest in Reporting of Scientific Information Chest, July 1, 2009; 136(1): 253 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Booth, D. W. Cescon, L. Wang, I. F. Tannock, and M. K. Krzyzanowska Evolution of the Randomized Controlled Trial in Oncology Over Three Decades J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2008; 26(33): 5458 - 5464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. Guyatt, D. J. Cook, R. Jaeschke, S. G. Pauker, and H. J. Schunemann Grades of Recommendation for Antithrombotic Agents: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 123S - 131S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Avouac, J Wipff, A Kahan, and Y Allanore Effects of oral treatments on exercise capacity in systemic sclerosis related pulmonary arterial hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 2008; 67(6): 808 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Reider Passing the Headline Test Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2007; 35(11): 1807 - 1808. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Riechelmann, L. Wang, A. O'Carroll, and M. K. Krzyzanowska Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest by Authors of Clinical Trials and Editorials in Oncology J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2007; 25(29): 4642 - 4647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gogol Standards in dementia care Age Ageing, September 1, 2007; 36(5): 599 - 600. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Lynch, M. R.A. Cunningham, W. J. Warme, D. C. Schaad, F. M. Wolf, and S. S. Leopold Commercially Funded and United States-Based Research Is More Likely to Be Published; Good-Quality Studies with Negative Outcomes Are Not J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2007; 89(5): 1010 - 1018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Okike and M. S. Kocher The Legal and Ethical Issues Surrounding Financial Conflict of Interest in Orthopaedic Research J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2007; 89(4): 910 - 913. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Irwin Clinical Trial Registration Promotes Patient Protection and Benefit, Advances the Trust of Everyone, and Is Required Chest, March 1, 2007; 131(3): 639 - 641. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Okike, M. S. Kocher, C. T. Mehlman, and M. Bhandari Conflict of Interest in Orthopaedic Research. An Association Between Findings and Funding in Scientific Presentations J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2007; 89(3): 608 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Glick Opprobrium or opportunity? J Am Dent Assoc, November 1, 2006; 137(11): 1484 - 1486. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Benjamin Jr, P. B. Smith, M. D. Murphy, R. Roberts, L. Mathis, D. Avant, R. M. Califf, and J. S. Li Peer-reviewed publication of clinical trials completed for pediatric exclusivity. JAMA, September 13, 2006; 296(10): 1266 - 1273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Ross and H. M. Krumholz Abstract Acceptance and Blinded Peer Review--Reply JAMA, September 13, 2006; 296(10): 1230 - 1231. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. M. Montori, Y. G. Wang, P. Alonso-Coello, and S. Bhagra Systematic Evaluation of the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Diabetes Diabetes Care, August 1, 2006; 29(8): 1833 - 1838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Chalmers From optimism to disillusion about commitment to transparency in the medico-industrial complex J R Soc Med, July 1, 2006; 99(7): 337 - 341. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Jacobs, J. O. Galante, S. K. Mirza, and T. Zdeblick Symposium. Relationships with Industry: Critical for New Technology or an Unnecessary Evil? J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2006; 88(7): 1650 - 1663. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R E Ferner and S. E McDowell How NICE may be outflanked. BMJ, May 27, 2006; 332(7552): 1268 - 1271. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M Ridker and J. Torres Reported outcomes in major cardiovascular clinical trials funded by for-profit and not-for-profit organizations: 2000-2005. JAMA, May 17, 2006; 295(19): 2270 - 2274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Arnold, D. A. Fergusson, A. K.C. Chan, R. J. Cook, G. A. Fraser, W. Lim, M. A. Blajchman, and D. J. Cook Avoiding transfusions in children undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials of aprotinin. Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2006; 102(3): 731 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Siegfried, M. Clarke, and J. Volmink Randomised controlled trials in Africa of HIV and AIDS: descriptive study and spatial distribution BMJ, October 1, 2005; 331(7519): 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Goodman When an Asthma Drug Has an Inferiority Complex: A Noninferiority Trial Pediatrics, August 1, 2005; 116(2): 493 - 495. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Sterk and K. F. Rabe Serving researchers, the impact factor and other conflicts of interest. Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2005; 25(1): 3 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R Lexchin Implications of Pharmaceutical Industry Funding on Clinical Research Ann. Pharmacother., January 1, 2005; 39(1): 194 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Califf, S. E. Nissen, A. N. DeMaria, E. M. Ohman, B. Pitt, J. T. Willerson, D. W. Bilheimer, J. N. Cohn, D. W. Feigal Jr, L. Hampson, et al. Task force 2: Investigator participation in clinical research J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 19, 2004; 44(8): 1729 - 1736. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Califf, S. E. Nissen, A. N. DeMaria, E. M. Ohman, B. Pitt, J. T. Willerson, D. W. Bilheimer, J. N. Cohn, D. W. Feigal Jr, L. Hampson, et al. Task Force 2: Investigator Participation in Clinical Research Circulation, October 19, 2004; 110(16): 2517 - 2524. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Rennie Trial Registration: A Great Idea Switches From Ignored to Irresistible JAMA, September 15, 2004; 292(11): 1359 - 1362. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J A C Delaney Tracking system for studies should be in place BMJ, July 17, 2004; 329(7458): 173 - 173. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Voysey SSRI treatment for under-18s Can. Med. Assoc. J., June 8, 2004; 170(12): 1771 - 1771. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bhandari, V. M. Montori, and P.J. Devereaux SSRI treatment for under-18s Can. Med. Assoc. J., June 8, 2004; 170(12): 1771 - 1771. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Hirsch Randomized clinical trials: What gets published, and when? Can. Med. Assoc. J., February 17, 2004; 170(4): 481 - 483. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||