|
From the Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn. (Gami, Montori), the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Montori, Wilczynski, Haynes) and the Department of Medicine (Haynes), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
Background: Author self-citation is the practice of citing one's previous publications in a new publication. Its extent is unknown. We studied author self-citation, choosing the major clinical field of diabetes mellitus to represent the general medical literature.
Methods: We identified every article about diabetes mellitus in 170 hand-searched clinical journals published in 2000. For every article, we recorded the bibliographic citation and publication type (original or review article) and assessed the methodologic rigour. Citation information was obtained from the ISI Web of Knowledge in April 2003.
Results: Of 49 028 articles, 289 were about diabetes mellitus and had citation information. Citation counts ranged from 0 to 347 (median 6, interquartile range [IQR] 212). Author self-citation counts ranged from 0 to 16 (median 1, IQR 02). Author self-citations accounted for an average of 18% (95% confidence interval [CI] 15%21%) and a median of 7% (95% CI 5% 11%) of all citations of each publication that was cited at least once (n = 266). Original articles had double the mean proportion of author self-citations compared with review articles (19% v. 9%; median 7% v. 0%, difference 7%, 95% CI 0 10%). Methodologic rigour and review type were not significantly associated with subsequent author self-citation.
Interpretation: Nearly one-fifth of all citations to articles about diabetes mellitus in clinical journals in the year 2000 were author self-citations. The frequency of self-citation was not associated with the quality of publications. These findings are likely applicable to the general clinical medicine literature and may have important implications for the assessment of journal or publication importance and the process of scientific discovery.
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. V. Kulkarni, B. Aziz, I. Shams, and J. W. Busse Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals JAMA, September 9, 2009; 302(10): 1092 - 1096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Chew, E. V Villanueva, and M. B Van Der Weyden Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views J R Soc Med, March 1, 2007; 100(3): 142 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Glick You are what you cite: The role of references in scientific publishing J Am Dent Assoc, January 1, 2007; 138(1): 12 - 14. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Bastian 'They would say that, wouldn't they?' A reader's guide to author and sponsor biases in clinical research J R Soc Med, December 1, 2006; 99(12): 611 - 614. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Falagas and P. Kavvadia "Eigenlob": self-citation in biomedical journals FASEB J, June 1, 2006; 20(8): 1039 - 1042. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cheek, B. Garnham, and J. Quan What's in a Number? Issues in Providing Evidence of Impact and Quality of Research(ers) Qual Health Res, March 1, 2006; 16(3): 423 - 435. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Kherani and M. Fung To self-cite or not to self-cite Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 26, 2004; 171(9): 1024 - 1024. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Gami, V. M. Montori, and R. B. Haynes To self-cite or not to self-cite Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 26, 2004; 171(9): 1024 - 1024. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kovacic and A. Misak Author self-citation in medical literature Can. Med. Assoc. J., June 22, 2004; 170(13): 1929 - 1930. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters