CMAJ • June 22, 2004; 170 (13). doi:10.1503/cmaj.1031474.
© 2004 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow [Videos]
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woo, J. K.H.
Right arrow Articles by Richter, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woo, J. K.H.
Right arrow Articles by Richter, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Undergraduate (including medical student issues)
Right arrow Other medical careers
Right arrowRelated Article


Research
Recherche

Effect of patient socioeconomic status on perceptions of first- and second-year medical students

James K.H. Woo, Sahar H. Ghorayeb, Cheong K. Lee, Harpreet Sangha and Suzanne Richter

The authors are medical students at the University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.

Background: Physician decision-making and perceptions of patients are affected by a patient's socioeconomic status (SES). We sought to determine if the perceptions of first- and second-year medical students are similarly affected. We also wanted to determine whether a student's own SES affects his or her perceptions of patients from a low or high SES background.

Methods: Two similar videos of a physician–patient interview were created. One video featured a patient of apparently high SES and the other featured a patient of apparently low SES. Differences in SES were portrayed by means of clothing, accessories and dialogue. First- and second-year medical students at the University of Western Ontario were recruited to view 1 of the videos and to answer a questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale.

Results: Responses were obtained from 205 (89%) of the 231 medical students invited to participate. Respondents' perceptions of the low SES and high SES patients were significantly different in the following respects. The low SES patient was perceived to be less compliant in taking medications and less likely to return for follow-up visits; was perceived to have a lower level of social support, poorer overall health and a worse prognosis; and was perceived to be more adversely affected in his occupational duties by illness (p < 0.05). Furthermore, second-year students who watched the video with the low SES patient were less inclined to want that patient in their practice than second-year students who watched the video with the high SES patient (p = 0.032). One hundred and six students (52%) were categorized as having high SES and 37 (18%) as having low SES (the remaining students were categorized as having mid-level SES). Among students who watched the video with the low SES patient, the level of agreement with the statement "This person is the kind of patient I would like to have in my practice" was greater among low SES students than among high SES students (p = 0.012).

Interpretation: First- and second-year medical students have negative perceptions of low SES patients on several dimensions.



Related Article

Career choice of new medical students at three Canadian universities: family medicine versus specialty medicine
Bruce Wright, Ian Scott, Wayne Woloschuk, and Fraser Brenneis
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2004 170: 1920-1924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
R. A. Kuthy, M. R. McQuistan, K. J. Riniker, K. E. Heller, and F. Qian
Students' Comfort Level in Treating Vulnerable Populations and Future Willingness to Treat: Results Prior to Extramural Participation
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2005; 69(12): 1307 - 1314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
C. Lu, E. Wirrell, and M. Blackman
Where Do Families of Children With Epilepsy Obtain Their Information?
J Child Neurol, November 1, 2005; 20(11): 905 - 910.
[Abstract] [PDF]