 Advertisement | ||||||||
 | ||||||||
|
||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
|
¶**
From *the UBC Bone Health Research Group, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; the BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre Osteoporosis Program, Vancouver, BC; the School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; ¶the Department of Health Evaluation Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pa.; **the UKK Institute, Tampere, Finland; the Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; the Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; the Department of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
Correspondence to: Dr. Karim Khan, UBC Bone Health Research Group, University of British Columbia, Room 175, James Mather Building, 5804 Fairview Ave., Vancouver BC V6T 1Z3; fax 604 822-6950; kkhan{at}interchange.ubc.ca
Background: Exercise programs improve balance, strength and agility in elderly people and thus may prevent falls. However, specific exercise programs that might be widely used in the community and that might be "prescribed" by physicians, especially for patients with osteoporosis, have not been evaluated. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of such a program designed specifically for women with osteoporosis.
Methods: We identified women 65 to 75 years of age in whom osteoporosis had been diagnosed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in our hospital between 1996 and 2000 and who were not engaged in regular weekly programs of moderate or hard exercise. Women who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to participate in a twice-weekly exercise class or to not participate in the class. We measured baseline data and, 20 weeks later, changes in static balance (by dynamic posturography), dynamic balance (by a timed figure-eight run) and knee extension strength (by dynamometry).
Results: Of 93 women who began the trial, 80 completed it. Before adjustment for covariates, the intervention group tended to have greater, although nonsignificant, improvements in static balance (mean difference 4.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] –1.3% to 11.0%), dynamic balance (mean difference 3.3%, 95% CI –1.7% to 8.4%) and knee extension strength (mean difference 7.8%, 95% CI –5.4% to 21.0%). Mean crude changes in the static balance score were –0.85 (95% CI –2.91 to 1.21) for the control group and 1.40 (95% CI –0.66 to 3.46) for the intervention group. Mean crude changes in figure-eight velocity (dynamic balance) were 0.08 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.14) m/s for the control group and 0.14 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.20) m/s for the intervention group. For knee extension strength, mean changes were –0.58 (95% CI –3.02 to 1.81) kg/m for the control group and 1.03 (95% CI –1.31 to 3.34) kg/m for the intervention group. After adjustment for age, physical activity and years of estrogen use, the improvement in dynamic balance was 4.9% greater for the intervention group than for the control group (p = 0.044). After adjustment for physical activity, cognitive status and number of fractures ever, the improvement in knee extension strength was 12.8% greater for the intervention group than for the control group (p = 0.047). The intervention group also had a 6.3% greater improvement in static balance after adjustment for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.06).
Interpretation: Relative to controls, participants in the exercise program experienced improvements in dynamic balance and strength, both important determinants of risk for falls, particularly in older women with osteoporosis.
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. M. Palombaro, L. M. Hack, K. K. Mangione, A. E. Barr, R. A. Newton, F. Magri, and T. Speziale Gait Variability Detects Women in Early Postmenopause With Low Bone Mineral Density Physical Therapy, December 1, 2009; 89(12): 1315 - 1326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W.-C. Li, Y.-C. Chen, R.-S. Yang, and J.-Y. Tsauo Effects of exercise programmes on quality of life in osteoporotic and osteopenic postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2009; 23(10): 888 - 896. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. S. Vaapio, M. J. Salminen, A. Ojanlatva, and S.-L. Kivela Quality of life as an outcome of fall prevention interventions among the aged: a systematic review Eur J Public Health, January 1, 2009; 19(1): 7 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. A. Zecevic, A. W. Salmoni, M. Speechley, and A. A. Vandervoort Defining a Fall and Reasons for Falling: Comparisons Among the Views of Seniors, Health Care Providers, and the Research Literature Gerontologist, June 1, 2006; 46(3): 367 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Liu-Ambrose, J. J. Eng, K. M. Khan, N. D. Carter, and H. A. McKay Older Women With Osteoporosis Have Increased Postural Sway and Weaker Quadriceps Strength Than Counterparts With Normal Bone Mass: Overlooked Determinants of Fracture Risk? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, September 1, 2003; 58(9): M862 - M866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Minerva BMJ, November 9, 2002; 325(7372): 1122 - 1122. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. J. Campbell Preventing fractures by preventing falls in older women Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 29, 2002; 167(9): 1005 - 1006. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | HELP | SEARCH |
|
|||||
|
Copyright 1995-2002, Canadian Medical Association. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329
(e) 0820-3946 (p)
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association. |
|||||
