|
At the time of writing, Dr. Khairy was with the Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Que. He is now with the Department of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. Dr. Nattel is with the Research Center, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Que.
Correspondence to: Dr. Stanley Nattel, Research Center, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Bélanger St. E, Montreal QC H1T 1C8; fax 514 376-5241; nattel{at}icm.umontreal.ca
Abstract
ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AF) IS A COMMON CONTRIBUTOR to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Two generally acceptable strategies exist for long-term AF management, with ongoing studies comparing the overall mortality associated with each. One strategy aims to maintain sinus rhythm, with antiarrhythmic agents if necessary, thereby preserving physiological cardiac electrical function but exposing the patient to the potential side effects of potent drugs. The second approach is to control the ventricular rate and prevent thromboembolic complications with anticoagulants, leaving the patient with AF. Both beta-blocking agents and calcium antagonists are more effective than digoxin in achieving rate control. Several nonpharmacological therapies including catheter ablation, implantable devices and surgical interventions show promise for rate control and maintenance of sinus rhythm. This paper provides an overview of new developments in pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapy. Key features of recently published clinical guidelines, including a unified classification scheme for AF and issues relating to rate control and maintenance of sinus rhythm, are considered. In addition, preliminary results from the recently presented AFFIRM study, the largest AF trial to date, are summarized. Finally, we discuss recent insights into the basic mechanisms underlying AF that have potentially significant clinical implications.
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Laszlo, C. Eick, N. Rueb, S. Weretka, H.-J. Weig, J. Schreieck, and R. F Bosch Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system: effects on tachycardia-induced early electrical remodelling in rabbit atrium Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, September 1, 2008; 9(3): 125 - 132. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Rosborough Cardiac Surgery in Elderly Patients: Strategies to Optimize Outcomes Crit. Care Nurse, October 1, 2006; 26(5): 24 - 31. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. McCarthy, P. T. Pollak, E. A. Hanniman, and C. J. Sinal Disruption of Hepatic Lipid Homeostasis in Mice after Amiodarone Treatment Is Associated with Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{alpha}Target Gene Activation J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2004; 311(3): 864 - 873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Pratt, S. N. Singh, H. R. Al-Khalidi, J. M. Brum, M. J. Holroyde, S. R. Marcello, P. J. Schwartz, A. J. Camm, and ALIVE Investigators The efficacy of azimilide in the treatment of atrial fibrillation in the presence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction: Results from the Azimilide Postinfarct Survival Evaluation (ALIVE) trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 7, 2004; 43(7): 1211 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. G. Krohn, S. Zhuang, Y. Zhang, K. A. Mowrey, T. Tabata, D. W. Wallick, Z. B. Popovic, R. A. Grimm, A. Natale, T. N. Mazgalev, et al. Inappropriate Use of Atrioventricular Nodal Vagal Stimulation in Atrial Fibrillation * Response Circulation, April 8, 2003; 107 (13): e90 - e90. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nattel Rhythm versus rate control for atrial fibrillation management: what recent randomized clinical trials allow us to affirm Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 4, 2003; 168(5): 572 - 573. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||