Advertisement
ADVANCED SEARCH

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Correction (v168,p1529) Correction (v168,p152) Submit a response View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Natarajan, M. K. Articles by Yusuf, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Natarajan, M. K. Articles by Yusuf, S. Related Collections Other cardiovascular medicine Related Article

The risks of waiting for cardiac catheterization: a prospective study

Madhu K. Natarajan^*, Shamir R. Mehta^*, Douglas H. Holder^*, David R. Goodhart^*, Amiram Gafni, Donald Shilton^*, Rizwan Afzal^*, Koon Teo^* and Salim Yusuf^*

From *the Division of Cardiology, Population Health Research Institute, and the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.

Correspondence to: Dr. Madhu K. Natarajan, Hamilton Health Sciences – General Site, 237 Barton St. E, Hamilton ON L8L 2X2; fax 905 527-2337; natarajm{at}ccc.mcmaster.ca

Background: Few large, systematic, prospective studies have documented the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients awaiting cardiac catheterization and the delays that they experience. The primary objective of this study was to quantify the waiting times, morbidity and mortality of patients waiting for catheterization. A secondary objective was to identify predictors of cardiac events that occur while patients are waiting.

Methods: A computerized, prospective, central waiting list registry was developed at a regional centre in Hamilton, Ont., serving 2.2 million people in southern Ontario. Between Apr. 1, 1998, and Mar. 31, 2000, 8030 consecutive patients (4725 outpatients and 3305 inpatients) were referred for cardiac catheterization. Major cardiac outcomes while on the waiting list (death, myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure) were documented prospectively and related to requested versus actual waiting time.

Results: Most of the referrals (7345 [91.5%]) were for a primary diagnosis of suspected coronary artery disease. The median waiting time was 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 4) days for inpatients and 60 (IQR 68) days for outpatients. Actual waiting times correlated with the waiting times requested by the referring physicians. However, only 37% of the procedures overall were completed within the requested waiting time. Of the 8030 patients, 50 (0.6%) died, 32 (0.4%) had a myocardial infarction and 41 (0.5%) experienced congestive heart failure. Overall, 109 patients (1.4%) had a major cardiac event, namely, death, myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure. These events occurred over a median wait of 27 days (2 days for inpatients and 35 days for outpatients), and over half (57%) occurred within the waiting time requested by the referring physician. In the multivariate analysis, predictors of the composite of death, myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure were increasing age (relative risk [RR] 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52–3.75) and New York Heart Association class III/IV symptoms (RR 2.86, 95% CI 1.11–7.33) in inpatients, and increasing age (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.12–1.66), aortic stenosis (RR 3.70, 95% CI 1.93–7.08) and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 35% (RR 4.35, 95% CI 2.48–7.61) in outpatients.

Interpretation: Patients awaiting cardiac catheterization may experience major adverse events, such as death, myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure, which may be preventable. Our findings provide a benchmark by which to measure the effect of increased capacity and prioritization schemes that allow earlier access for patients at higher risk, such as those with aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular function.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Diamond Con: Single-Payer Health Care: Why It's Not the Best Answer Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2009; 180(10): 921 - 922. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Budoff, D. Dowe, J. G. Jollis, M. Gitter, J. Sutherland, E. Halamert, M. Scherer, R. Bellinger, A. Martin, R. Benton, et al. Diagnostic Performance of 64-Multidetector Row Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Individuals Without Known Coronary Artery Disease: Results From the Prospective Multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 18, 2008; 52(21): 1724 - 1732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Alter, J. V. Tu, P. C. Austin, and C. D. Naylor Waiting times, revascularization modality, and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without on-site revascularization facilities in Canada J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 6, 2003; 42(3): 410 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Baicus Relative risks or odds ratios? Can. Med. Assoc. J., June 10, 2003; 168(12): 1529 - 1529. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. K. Natarajan and R. Afzal Relative risks or odds ratios? Can. Med. Assoc. J., June 10, 2003; 168(12): 1529 - 1529. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Corrections Can. Med. Assoc. J., June 10, 2003; 168(12): 1529 - 1529. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Ezekowitz and P. W. Armstrong The waiting game: facing the consequences Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 26, 2002; 167(11): 1247 - 1248. [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

HOME	CURRENT ISSUE	PAST ISSUES	COLLECTIONS	HELP	SEARCH
Copyright 1995-2002, Canadian Medical Association. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p) All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.