Advertisement
ADVANCED SEARCH

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Barnett, H. J.M. Articles by Eliasziw, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Barnett, H. J.M. Articles by Eliasziw, M. Related Collections Other cardiovascular medicine

The appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy

John P. Robarts Research Institute, London, Ont.

Correspondence to: Dr. H.J.M. Barnett, The John P. Robarts Research Institute, 100 Perth Dr., Box 5015, London ON N6A 5K8; fax 519 663-3489; barnett{at}rri.on.ca

Abstract

FOR THE FIRST 30 YEARS AFTER CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY WAS FIRST DEVELOPED, anecdotal evidence was used to identify patients with internal carotid artery disease for whom this procedure would be appropriate. More recently, the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic patients and asymptomatic subjects has emerged from 7 randomized trials. Risk of stroke and benefit from the procedure are greatest for symptomatic patients with at least 70% stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Within this group, carotid endarterectomy is most beneficial for the following patients: otherwise healthy elderly patients, those with hemispheric transient ischemic attack, those with tandem extracranial and intracranial lesions and those without evidence of collateral vessels. Risk of perioperative stroke and death is higher in the following groups, although they still benefit: patients with widespread leukoaraiosis, those with occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery and those with intraluminal thrombus. Patients with 50% to 69% stenosis experience lesser benefit, and some other groups may even be harmed by carotid endarterectomy, including women and patients with transient monocular blindness only. The procedure is indicated for patients presenting with lacunar stroke and for those with a nearly occluded internal carotid artery, but the benefit is muted. Patients with less than 50% stenosis do not benefit. In the largest randomized trial of asymptomatic subjects, the perioperative risk of stroke and death was very low (1.5%), but the results indicated that a prohibitively high number of subjects (83) must be treated to prevent one stroke in 2 years. The subsequent literature reported higher perioperative risks (2.8% to 5.6%). In asymptomatic individuals nearly half of the strokes that occur may be due to heart and small-vessel disease. These limitations counter any potential benefit. Another trial is in progress and may identify subgroups of asymptomatic subjects who would benefit. Meanwhile, most individuals without symptoms fare better with medical care.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L.-P. Girard, T. E. Feasby, M. Eliasziw, H. Quan, J. Kennedy, H. J.M. Barnett, and W. A. Ghali Complication Rates After Left- Versus Right-Sided Carotid Endarterectomy Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, November 1, 2009; 2(6): 642 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J.M. Barnett Personal Reflections From a Front-Row Seat at the Greatest Show on Earth (Life): Part II (Stroke Research Commentary) Stroke, March 1, 2009; 40(3): e53 - e65. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. S. Jahromi, R. P. Tummala, J. Yamamoto, E. I. Levy, A. H. Siddiqui, and L. N. Hopkins EARLY CAROTID STENTING FOR SYMPTOMATIC STENOSIS AND INTRALUMINAL THROMBUS PRESENTING WITH STROKE Neurology, November 25, 2008; 71(22): 1831 - 1833. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B Giusti, C Saracini, P Bolli, A Magi, I Sestini, E Sticchi, G Pratesi, R Pulli, C Pratesi, and R Abbate Genetic analysis of 56 polymorphisms in 17 genes involved in methionine metabolism in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm J. Med. Genet., November 1, 2008; 45(11): 721 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Feasby, J. Kennedy, H. Quan, L. Girard, and W. A. Ghali Real-World Replication of Randomized Controlled Trial Results for Carotid Endarterectomy Arch Neurol, October 1, 2007; 64(10): 1496 - 1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Spence, A. Tamayo, S. P. Lownie, W. P. Ng, and G. G. Ferguson Absence of Microemboli on Transcranial Doppler Identifies Low-Risk Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Stroke, November 1, 2005; 36(11): 2373 - 2378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Hill, F. M. Shrive, J. Kennedy, T. E. Feasby, and W. A. Ghali Simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass surgery in Canada Neurology, April 26, 2005; 64(8): 1435 - 1437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. S. Friedman, M. Eliasziw, H. J.M. Barnett, J. Killestein, S. B. Tonarelli, R. G. Hart, J. S. Yadav, K. Ouriel, and P. Fayad Carotid-Artery Stenting versus Endarterectomy N. Engl. J. Med., February 10, 2005; 352(6): 624 - 627. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Hathout, J. R. Fink, S. M. El-Saden, and E. G. Grant Sonographic NASCET Index: A New Doppler Parameter for Assessment of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2005; 26(1): 68 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Gladstone and D. J. Sahlas Should people with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis undergo endarterectomy for primary stroke prevention? Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 28, 2004; 171(7): 726 - 727. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Kennedy, H. Quan, W. A. Ghali, and T. E. Feasby Variations in rates of appropriate and inappropriate carotid endarterectomy for stroke prevention in 4 Canadian provinces Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 31, 2004; 171(5): 455 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J.M. Barnett The inappropriate use of carotid endarterectomy Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 31, 2004; 171(5): 473 - 474. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Gladstone, M. K. Kapral, J. Fang, A. Laupacis, and J. V. Tu Management and outcomes of transient ischemic attacks in Ontario Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 30, 2004; 170(7): 1099 - 1104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Kennedy, H. Quan, W. A. Ghali, and T. E. Feasby Importance of the imaging modality in decision making about carotid endarterectomy Neurology, March 23, 2004; 62(6): 901 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Hill, M. M. Foss, J. V. Tu, and T. E. Feasby Factors influencing the decision to perform carotid endarterectomy Neurology, March 9, 2004; 62(5): 803 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Nonent, J.-M. Serfaty, N. Nighoghossian, F. Rouhart, L. Derex, C. Rotaru, P. Chirossel, B. Guias, J.-F. Heautot, P. Gouny, et al. Concordance Rate Differences of 3 Noninvasive Imaging Techniques to Measure Carotid Stenosis in Clinical Routine Practice: Results of the CARMEDAS Multicenter Study Stroke, March 1, 2004; 35(3): 682 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Barr, J. J. Connors III, D. Sacks, J. C. Wojak, G. J. Becker, J. F. Cardella, B. Chopko, J. E. Dion, A. J. Fox, R. T. Higashida, et al. Quality Improvement Guidelines for the Performance of Cervical Carotid Angioplasty and Stent Placement: Developed by a Collaborative Panel of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, the American Society of Neuroradiology, and the Society of Interventional Radiology AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2003; 24(10): 2020 - 2034. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. B. Goldstein Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenosis Stroke, November 1, 2003; 34(11): 2767 - 2773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M Hathout, M. J. Duh, and S. M. El-Saden Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography in Predicting Angiographic Stenosis of the Internal Carotid Artery: Linear Regression Analysis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2003; 24(9): 1747 - 1756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Gillett, W. A. Davis, D. Jackson, D. G. Bruce, and T. M.E. Davis Prospective Evaluation of Carotid Bruit as a Predictor of First Stroke in Type 2 Diabetes: The Fremantle Diabetes Study Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34(9): 2145 - 2151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Tsong Tan and A. D. Blann To stroke or not to stroke: Is ICAM-1 or CRP the answer? Neurology, June 24, 2003; 60(12): 1884 - 1885. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Feasby Editorial Comment: How Appropriate Is Carotid Endarterectomy? Stroke, June 1, 2003; 34(6): 1471 - 1472. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Hegele, M. Eliasziw, and M. De Angelis Sex, Diabetes, and Stroke After Carotid Endarterectomy Diabetes Care, May 1, 2003; 26(5): 1641 - 1641. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J. M. Barnett Efficacy of Carotid Endarterectomy Translates to Being Efficacious With Appropriate Surgical Skill Arch Neurol, December 1, 2002; 59(12): 1866 - 1868. [Full Text] [PDF]

HOME	CURRENT ISSUE	PAST ISSUES	COLLECTIONS	HELP	SEARCH
Copyright 1995-2002, Canadian Medical Association. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p) All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.