This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prior, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Group, f.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prior, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Group, f.
Related Collections
Right arrow Osteoporosis
Right arrow Menopause (including HRT)
Right arrow Family planning, contraception
CMAJ • October 16, 2001; 165 (8)
© 2001 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors


Research
Recherche

Oral contraceptive use and bone mineral density in premenopausal women: cross-sectional, population-based data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study

Jerilynn C. Prior*, Susan A. Kirkland{dagger}, Lawrence Joseph{ddagger}, Nancy Kreiger{dagger}{dagger}, Timothy M. Murray**, David A. Hanley{ddagger}{ddagger}, Jonathan D. Adachi§§, Yvette M. Vigna*, Claudie Berger{ddagger}, Lucie Blondeau, Stuart A. Jackson¶¶, Alan Tenenhouse§ and for Group

From the *Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, and Vancouver Hospital, Vancouver, BC; the {dagger}Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; the {ddagger}Department of Clinical Epidemiology and the §Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Que.; the ¶Department of Epidemiology and the **Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; {dagger}{dagger}Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ont.; the {ddagger}{ddagger}Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; the §§Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; and the ¶¶Department of Radiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.

Background: Positive and negative effects on bone mineral density (BMD) have been described as a result of the premenopausal use of oral contraceptives (OCs); increased fracture rates have also been reported. This study assessed the relation between OC use and BMD in a population-based, 9-centre, national sample of women aged 25–45 years.

Methods: Premenopausal women who had been enrolled in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study were classified as having ever been OC users (>= 3 months) or as having never been OC users (0 to < 3 months). Data were obtained through extensive questionnaires and measuring of participants' weight, height and the BMD of lumbar vertebrae and the proximal femur.

Results: Of the sample of 524 women, whose mean age was 36.3 (standard deviation [SD] 5.9) years, 454 had used OCs; their mean age when they started using OCs was 19.8 (SD 3.5) years and the mean duration of use was 6.8 (SD 4.8) years. Women who had ever and those who had never used OCs showed no differences in age, age at menarche, parity, current calcium intake, exercise, body mass index (BMI), education, past irregular cycles or amenorrhea. OC users reported more alcohol and cigarette use and more use of medications to create regular cycles. Mean BMD values (adjusted for age, BMI and height) were 0.02–0.04 g/cm2 (that is, 2.3%–3.7%) lower in OC users, and were significantly lower in the spine and trochanter. The BMD of the spine in OC users was 1.03 (SD 0.12) g/cm2 >versus 1.07 (SD 0.12) g/cm2 >(95% confidence interval [CI] of difference –0.07 to –0.001) in those who had never used OCs. BMD was neither related to the duration of OC use nor to gynecological age at first use. Current and past users had similar BMD values.

Interpretation: National, population-based data show lower BMD values for the trochanter and spine in premenopausal women who have used OCs compared with those who have never used OCs.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
S L Liu and C M Lebrun
Effect of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy on bone mineral density in premenopausal and perimenopausal women: a systematic review
Br. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2006; 40(1): 11 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Massai, L. Makarainen, A. Kuukankorpi, C. Klipping, I. Duijkers, and T. Dieben
The combined contraceptive vaginal ring and bone mineral density in healthy pre-menopausal women
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2764 - 2768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Rickenlund, K. Carlstrom, B. Ekblom, T. B. Brismar, B. von Schoultz, and A. L. Hirschberg
Effects of Oral Contraceptives on Body Composition and Physical Performance in Female Athletes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4364 - 4370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
M. L. Gourlay and S. A. Brown
Clinical Considerations in Premenopausal Osteoporosis
Arch Intern Med, March 22, 2004; 164(6): 603 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. K. Grinspoon, A. J. Friedman, K. K. Miller, J. Lippman, W. H. Olson, and M. P. Warren
Effects of a Triphasic Combination Oral Contraceptive Containing Norgestimate/Ethinyl Estradiol on Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism in Young Women with Osteopenia Secondary to Hypothalamic Amenorrhea
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2003; 88(8): 3651 - 3656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
M Burrows, A M Nevill, S Bird, and D Simpson
Physiological factors associated with low bone mineral density in female endurance runners
Br. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2003; 37(1): 67 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]