Advertisement
ADVANCED SEARCH

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Grant, F. C. Articles by Robblee, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Grant, F. C. Articles by Robblee, J. Related Collections Patient-caregiver communication Hematologic pathology (including blood transfusion) Cardiothoracic surgery

Evaluation of a decision aid for patients considering autologous blood donation before open-heart surgery

F. Curry Grant^*, Andreas Laupacis^*¶, Annette M. O'Connor^*, Fraser Rubens and James Robblee

From *the Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, and the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Loeb Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont.; the Departments of Surgery and Anesthesia, Ottawa Heart Institute, and the Faculty of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; and ¶the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. Dr. Grant is currently a research fellow at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ont.

Correspondence to: Dr. F. Curry Grant, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2075 Bayview Ave., Building G, Toronto ON M4N 3M5; fax 416 480-6048; curry.grant{at}ices.on.ca

Background: Patients undergoing open-heart surgery frequently require one or more blood transfusions. Because of the risks of receiving blood from volunteer donors, some patients choose to donate their own blood before surgery. This reduces their risk of exposure to volunteer-donated blood, but it increases their chance of receiving any transfusion, either of self-donated or volunteer-donated blood. Also, preoperative hemoglobin levels tend to be lower in patients who donate their own blood, and surgeons may be more likely to give transfusions to patients with self-donated blood. To help patients decide whether to donate their blood before surgery, we designed a decision aid comprising a booklet and audiotape and assessed its effectiveness.

Methods: The 59 study subjects were a sample of consecutive patients referred to the Ottawa Heart Institute between Oct. 1, 1998, and Jan. 5, 1999, for future coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery or combined surgery. All were eligible to donate blood. Initial questionnaires were administered in the clinic by a physician or study nurse, and follow-up questionnaires were completed at home and mailed in after use of the decision aid. Outcome measures included patients' knowledge, values (importance ratings), preferences for transfusion methods, decisional conflict (the amount of uncertainty about the course of action to take), risk perception and acceptability of the decision aid.

Results: Mean knowledge scores on a 15-item test increased from 67% correct responses before the decision aid to 85% correct responses after use of the aid (p < 0.001); the effect was similar when the patients were divided into subgroups according to education level. The number of patients favouring donating their own blood increased from 41 (69%) before to 45 (76%) after use of the aid. Nine (64%) of 14 initially uncertain patients preferred autologous donation after use of the aid. The overall mean score for decisional conflict was unchanged, at 1.7, which indicated a low level of uncertainty. Risk perception improved, from 0%–14% correct responses on an 8-item test before the aid to 18%–60% correct responses after use of the aid. The decision aid was acceptable to the majority of patients, and 95% indicated that they would recommend it to others.

Interpretation: The decision aid improved knowledge and risk perceptions of blood donation and transfusion, and it helped uncertain patients to make choices.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. L. Nelson, P. K. J. Han, A. Fagerlin, M. Stefanek, and P. A. Ubel Rethinking the Objectives of Decision Aids: A Call for Conceptual Clarity Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 609 - 618. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Weir Weighing the risks and benefits of autologous blood donation Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 1, 2001; 165(5): 529 - 529. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. C. Grant Weighing the risks and benefits of autologous blood donation Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 1, 2001; 165(5): 529 - 529. [Full Text]

HOME	CURRENT ISSUE	PAST ISSUES	COLLECTIONS	HELP	SEARCH
Copyright 1995-2001, Canadian Medical Association. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p) All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.