This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lemelin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Baskerville, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lemelin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Baskerville, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health services research
Right arrow Nursing (includes nurse practitioners)
Right arrow Changing physician behaviour
Right arrow Health education
Right arrow Postgraduate: CME, CPD
CMAJ • March 20, 2001; 164 (6)
© 2001 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors


Research
Recherche

Evidence to action: a tailored multifaceted approach to changing family physician practice patterns and improving preventive care

Jacques Lemelin, William Hogg and Neill Baskerville

Dr. Lemelin is Associate Professor, Dr. Hogg is Professor, and Mr. Baskerville is Assistant Professor with the Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.

Background: Although there is much room for improvement in the performance of recommended preventive manoeuvres, many inappropriate preventive interventions are being done. We evaluated a multifaceted intervention, delivered by nurses trained in prevention facilitation, to improve prevention in primary care.

Methods: Forty-six health service organizations (HSOs) were recruited from 100 sites in Ontario. After baseline data were collected, we randomly assigned the practices to either an 18-month (July 1997 to December 1998) multifaceted intervention delivered by 1 of 3 nurse facilitators (23 practices) or no intervention (23 practices). The unit of intervention and analysis was the medical practice. The outcome measure was an overall index of preventive performance, which was calculated as the proportion of eligible patients who received 8 recommended preventive manoeuvres less the proportion of eligible patients who received 5 inappropriate preventive manoeuvres.

Results: One HSO, in the intervention group, was lost to follow-up. Before the intervention, the index of preventive performance was similar for the intervention and control groups (31.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 27.3%–36.5%] and 32.1% [95% CI 27.2%–37.0%] respectively). At follow-up the corresponding values were 43.2% (95% CI 38.4%–48.0%) and 31.9% (95% CI 26.8%–37.0%), for an absolute improvement in the intervention group of 11.5% (p < 0.001). The mean proportion of eligible patients who received the recommended manoeuvres was 62.3% (95% CI 58.2%–66.4%) in the intervention group, as compared with 57.4% (95% CI 54.1%–60.7%) in the control group, for an absolute improvement of 7.2% (p = 0.008). The corresponding values for the inappropriate manoeuvres were 19.1% (95% CI 15.6%–22.6%) and 25.5% (95% CI 20.0%–31.0%), for an absolute improvement of 4.4% (p = 0.019).

Interpretation: The tailored multifaceted intervention delivered by nurse facilitators was effective in modifying physician practice patterns and significantly improved preventive care performance.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
M. Petrova, J. Dale, D. Munday, J. Koistinen, S. Agarwal, and R. Lall
The role and impact of facilitators in primary care: findings from the implementation of the Gold Standards Framework for palliative care
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2010; 27(1): 38 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
cfpHome page
G. Swanson and J. Kaczorowski
Can you use a sequential sample of patients as a substitute for a full practice audit?: Study of mammography screening rates in 20 family practices in Ontario
Can Fam Physician, October 1, 2008; 54(10): 1436 - 1437.e5.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
C. E. Guerra, P. A. Gimotty, J. A. Shea, J. A. Pagan, J. S. Schwartz, and K. Armstrong
Effect of Guidelines on Primary Care Physician Use of PSA Screening: Results from the Community Tracking Study Physician Survey
Med Decis Making, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 681 - 689.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
S. A. Smith, N. D. Shah, S. C. Bryant, T. J. H. Christianson, S. S. Bjornsen, P. D. Giesler, K. Krause, P. J. Erwin, V. M. Montori, and Evidens Research Group
Chronic Care Model and Shared Care in Diabetes: Randomized Trial of an Electronic Decision Support System
Mayo Clin. Proc., July 1, 2008; 83(7): 747 - 757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
cfpHome page
W. Hogg, J. Lemelin, I. Moroz, E. Soto, and G. Russell
Improving prevention in primary care: Evaluating the sustainability of outreach facilitation
Can Fam Physician, May 1, 2008; 54(5): 712 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
W Hogg, J Lemelin, I. Graham, J Grimshaw, C Martin, L Moore, E Soto, and K O'Rourke
Improving prevention in primary care: evaluating the effectiveness of outreach facilitation
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2008; 25(1): 40 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
J. A. Boom, C. S. Nelson, L. E. Laufman, A. E. Kohrt, and C. A. Kozinetz
Improvement in Provider Immunization Knowledge and Behaviors Following a Peer Education Intervention
Clinical Pediatrics, October 1, 2007; 46(8): 706 - 717.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
K. K Anderson, R. J Sebaldt, L. Lohfeld, K. Burgess, F. C Donald, and J. Kaczorowski
Views of family physicians in southwestern Ontario on preventive care services and performance incentives
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2006; 23(4): 469 - 471.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
C. M Martin and W. Hogg
Doctors' performance needs to be discussed
BMJ, June 25, 2003; 326(7404): 1460 - 1460.
[Full Text]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
V. M. Montori, S. F. Dinneen, C. A. Gorman, B. R. Zimmerman, R. A. Rizza, S. S. Bjornsen, E. M. Green, S. C. Bryant, and S. A. Smith
The Impact of Planned Care and a Diabetes Electronic Management System on Community-Based Diabetes Care: The Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project
Diabetes Care, November 1, 2002; 25(11): 1952 - 1957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
L. A Becker
A tailored, multifaceted programme in capitation-based family practices improved appropriate use of preventive care manoeuvres
Evid. Based Med., November 1, 2001; 6(6): 191 - 191.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
J. Kaczorowski and J. Sellors
The ethics of anonymous chart reviews
Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 1, 2001; 165(4): 399 - 399.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
J. Lemelin, W. Hogg, B. Baskerville, and R. Saginur
The ethics of anonymous chart reviews
Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 1, 2001; 165(4): 399 - 401.
[Full Text]


Home page
CMAJHome page
M.-D. Beaulieu
Facilitating the integration of prevention in primary care: a work in progress
Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 1, 2001; 164(6): 790 - 791.
[Full Text] [PDF]