This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giacomini, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Anand, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giacomini, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Anand, S. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rationing
Right arrow Other ethics
Right arrow Guidelines
Right arrow Cardiothoracic surgery
CMAJ • March 6, 2001; 164 (5)
© 2001 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

Research
Recherche

Guidelines as rationing tools: a qualitative analysis of psychosocial patient selection criteria for cardiac procedures

Mita K. Giacomini*{dagger}, Deborah J. Cook*{ddagger}, David L. Streiner*§¶** and Sonia S. Anand*{ddagger}

From *the Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, {dagger}the Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, and the Departments of {ddagger}Medicine and §Psychiatry, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; ¶the Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Research, Toronto, Ont.; and **the Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.

Background: Cardiac procedure guidelines often include psychosocial criteria for selecting patients that potentially introduce social value judgements into clinical decisions and decisions about the rationing of care. The aim of this study was to investigate the terms and justifications for and the meanings of psychosocial patient characteristics used in cardiac procedure guidelines.

Methods: We selected English-language guidelines published since 1990 and chapters in textbooks published since 1989. These guidelines amalgamated multiple sources of evidence and expertise and made recommendations regarding patient selection for specific procedures. A multidisciplinary team of physicians and social scientists extracted passages regarding psychosocial criteria and developed categories and conceptual relationships to describe and interpret their content.

Results: Sixty-five papers met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Forty-five (69%) mentioned psychosocial criteria as procedure indications or contraindications. The latter fell into several categories, including behavioural and psychological issues, relationships with significant others, financial resources, social roles and environmental circumstances.

Interpretation: Psychosocial characteristics are portrayed as having 2 roles in patient selection: as risk factors intrinsic to the candidate or as indicators of need for special intervention. Guidelines typically simply list psychosocial contraindications without clarifying their specific nature or providing any justification for their use. Psychosocial considerations can help in the evaluation of patients for cardiac procedures, but they become ethically controversial when used to restrict access. The use of psychosocial indications and contraindications could be improved by more precise descriptions of the psychosocial problem at issue, explanations regarding why the criterion matters and justification of the characteristic using a biological rationale or research evidence.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
A. van der Heide, A. Vrakking, H. van Delden, C. Looman, and P. van der Maas
Medical and Nonmedical Determinants of Decision Making about Potentially Life-Prolonging Interventions
Med Decis Making, October 1, 2004; 24(5): 518 - 524.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 CMAJHome page
A. Mariotto
Nonclinical factors in patient selection for surgery
Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 1, 2001; 165(2): 153 - 153.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CMAJHome page
J. B. Dossetor
Psychosocial patient selection criteria in clinical practice guidelines: An ethical basis for rationing?
Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 1, 2001; 164(5): 642 - 643.
[Full Text] [PDF]