This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McAlister, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Graham, I. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McAlister, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Graham, I. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hypertension
Right arrow Guidelines
Right arrow Changing physician behaviour
Right arrow Patient-caregiver communication
CMAJ • February 20, 2001; 164 (4)
© 2001 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors


Review
Synthèse

The management of hypertension in Canada: a review of current guidelines, their shortcomings and implications for the future

Finlay A. McAlister*, Norman R.C. Campbell{dagger}, Kelly Zarnke{ddagger}, Mitchell Levine§ and Ian D. Graham

From *the Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; {dagger}the Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; {ddagger}the Division of General Internal Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont.; §the Centre for the Evaluation of Medicines, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; and ¶the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Loeb Health Research Centre, Ottawa, Ont.

Abstract

CLINICIANS ARE EXPOSED to numerous hypertension guidelines. However, their enthusiasm for these guidelines, and the impact of the guidelines, appears modest at best. Barriers to the successful implementation of a guideline can be identified at the level of the clinician, the patient or the practice setting; however, the shortcomings of the guidelines themselves have received little attention. In this paper, we review the hypertension guidelines that are most commonly encountered by Canadian clinicians: the "1999 Canadian Recommendations for the Management of Hypertension," "The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure" in the United States and the "1999 World Health Organization–International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension." The key points of these guidelines are compared and the shortcomings that may impede their ability to influence practice are discussed. The main implications for future guideline developers are outlined.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
M.-D. Beaulieu, M. Proulx, G. Jobin, M. Kugler, F. Gossard, J.-L. Denis, and D. Larouche
When Is Knowledge Ripe for Primary Care?: An Exploratory Study on the Meaning of Evidence
Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2008; 31(1): 22 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. Watine, B. Friedberg, E. Nagy, R. Onody, W. Oosterhuis, P. S. Bunting, J.-C. Charet, and A. R. Horvath
Conflict between Guideline Methodologic Quality and Recommendation Validity: A Potential Problem for Practitioners
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2006; 52(1): 65 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
F. A. McAlister, E. Wooltorton, N. R.C. Campbell, and for The Canadian Hypertension Education Program
The Canadian Hypertension Education Program (CHEP) recommendations: launching a new series
Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 30, 2005; 173(5): 508 - 509.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
C. L Richard and T. M Jurgens
Effects of Natural Health Products on Blood Pressure
Ann. Pharmacother., April 1, 2005; 39(4): 712 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Ghilardi, M. L. Biondi, O. Turri, E. Guagnellini, and R. Scorza
Internal Carotid Artery Occlusive Disease and Polymorphisms of Fractalkine Receptor CX3CR1: A Genetic Risk Factor
Stroke, June 1, 2004; 35(6): 1276 - 1279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. Wolf-Maier, R. S. Cooper, H. Kramer, J. R. Banegas, S. Giampaoli, M. R. Joffres, N. Poulter, P. Primatesta, B. Stegmayr, and M. Thamm
Hypertension Treatment and Control in Five European Countries, Canada, and the United States
Hypertension, January 1, 2004; 43(1): 10 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
G. L. Bakris, M. R. Weir, S. Shanifar, Z. Zhang, J. Douglas, D. J. van Dijk, and B. M. Brenner
Effects of Blood Pressure Level on Progression of Diabetic Nephropathy: Results From the RENAAL Study
Arch Intern Med, July 14, 2003; 163(13): 1555 - 1565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Ghilardi, M. L. Biondi, M. DeMonti, O. Turri, E. Guagnellini, and R. Scorza
Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 and Matrix Metalloproteinase-3 Gene Promoter Polymorphisms Are Associated With Carotid Artery Stenosis
Stroke, October 1, 2002; 33(10): 2408 - 2412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. J. Benjamin, S. C. Smith Jr, R. S. Cooper, M. N. Hill, and R. V. Luepker
Task Force #1--magnitude of the prevention problem: opportunities and challenges
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 21, 2002; 40(4): 588 - 603.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
D. Roth
Take a lesson from the drug companies
Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 1, 2001; 165(3): 272 - 272.
[Full Text] [PDF]