This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bland, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wen, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bland, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wen, S. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health services research
Right arrow Health Economics - see also Medicare
Right arrow Doctor-doctor communication
Right arrow Pregnancy
CMAJ • February 6, 2001; 164 (3)
© 2001 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

Research
Recherche

The effect of income pooling within a call group on rates of obstetric intervention

Elaine S. Bland*, Lawrence W. Oppenheimer*, Paul Holmes* and Shi Wu Wen*{dagger}

From the *Division of Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, University of Ottawa, and the {dagger}Bureau of Reproductive and Child Health, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ont.

Background: On July 1, 1997, the call group at a tertiary referral hospital in Ottawa changed its remuneration. The authors tested the hypothesis that change in an obstetric call group's remuneration from individual fee-for-service billing to equal sharing of the pooled group income would result in reduced rates of obstetric intervention.

Methods: Intervention rates were compared for the 12 months before (1678 births) and the 12 months after (1934 births) the change. Data were collected on onset of labour, indication for induction of labour, mode of delivery and neonatal outcome. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon's signed-rank test.

Results: The mean rate of elective induction of labour was 38.6% in the year before the change and 33.3% in the year after the change (p = 0.01). There were small but statistically significant increases in the mean duration of labour and mean length of the second stage (p = 0.03).

Interpretation: Billing policy may affect clinical decisions. Our findings add weight to the literature showing increased intervention rates with fee-for-service remuneration.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 CMAJHome page
C. v. Walraven and A. J. Forster
A time series would have been better
Can. Med. Assoc. J., June 1, 2001; 164(13): 1835 - 1835.
[Full Text] [PDF]