This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dalby, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Howard, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dalby, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Howard, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other infectious diseases
Right arrow Other geriatric medicine
Right arrow Vaccination
Right arrow Other respiratory infections
CMAJ • February 22, 2000; 162 (4)
© 2000 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors


Research
Recherche

Effect of preventive home visits by a nurse on the outcomes of frail elderly people in the community: a randomized controlled trial

Dawn M. Dalby*, John W. Sellors*{dagger}, Fred D. Fraser{ddagger}, Catherine Fraser{ddagger}, Cornelia van Ineveld§ and Michelle Howard*

From *the Health Services Delivery Research Unit, Father Sean O'Sullivan Research Centre, St. Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton, Ont.; {dagger}the Departments of Family Medicine and of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; {ddagger}the Stoney Creek Clinic Health Service Organization, Stoney Creek, Ont.; and §the Department of Geriatric Medicine, St. Boniface General Hospital, Winnipeg, Man.

Background: Timely recognition and prevention of health problems among elderly people have been shown to improve their health. In this randomized controlled trial the authors examined the impact of preventive home visits by a nurse compared with usual care on the outcomes of frail elderly people living in the community.

Methods: A screening questionnaire identified eligible participants (those aged 70 years or more at risk of sudden deterioration in health). Those randomly assigned to the visiting nurse group were assessed and followed up in their homes for 14 months. The primary outcome measure was the combined rate of deaths and admissions to an institution, and the secondary outcome measure the rate of health services utilization, during the 14 months; these rates were determined through a medical chart audit by a research nurse who was blind to group allocation.

Results: The questionnaire was mailed to 415 elderly people, of whom 369 (88.9%) responded. Of these, 198 (53.7%) were eligible, and 142 consented to participate and were randomly assigned to either the visiting nurse group (73) or the usual care group (69). The combined rate of deaths and admissions to an institution was 10.0% in the visiting nurse group and 5.8% in the usual care group (p = 0.52). The rate of health services utilization did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Influenza and pneumonia vaccination rates were significantly higher in the visiting nurse group (90.1% and 81.9%) than in the usual care group (53.0% and 0%) (p < 0.001).

Interpretation: The trial failed to show any effect of a visiting nurse other than vastly improved vaccination coverage.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
R. Monteserin, C. Brotons, I. Moral, S. Altimir, A. San Jose, S. Santaeugenia, J. Sellares, and J. Padros
Effectiveness of a geriatric intervention in primary care: a randomized clinical trial
Fam. Pract., January 6, 2010; (2010) cmp101v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
M. H. Coady, S. Galea, S. Blaney, D. C. Ompad, S. Sisco, D. Vlahov, and for the Project Viva Intervention Working Group
Project VIVA: A Multilevel Community-Based Intervention to Increase Influenza Vaccination Rates Among Hard-to-Reach Populations in New York City
Am J Public Health, July 1, 2008; 98(7): 1314 - 1321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med SciHome page
A. Bouman, E. van Rossum, S. Evers, T. Ambergen, G. Kempen, and P. Knipschild
Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment: Back to the Future Effects on Health Care Use and Associated Cost of a Home Visiting Program for Older People With Poor Health Status: A Randomized Clinical Trial in the Netherlands
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, March 1, 2008; 63(3): 291 - 297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
M. Markle-Reid, G. Browne, R. Weir, A. Gafni, J. Roberts, and S. R. Henderson
The Effectiveness and Efficiency of Home-Based Nursing Health Promotion for Older People: A Review of the Literature
Med Care Res Rev, October 1, 2006; 63(5): 531 - 569.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Epidemiol RevHome page
D. C. Ompad, S. Galea, and D. Vlahov
Distribution of Influenza Vaccine to High-Risk Groups
Epidemiol. Rev., August 1, 2006; 28(1): 54 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
M. Traeger, A. Thompson, E. Dickson, and A. Provencio
Bridging Disparity: A Multidisciplinary Approach for Influenza Vaccination in an American Indian Community
Am J Public Health, May 1, 2006; 96(5): 921 - 925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med SciHome page
J. McCusker and J. Verdon
Do Geriatric Interventions Reduce Emergency Department Visits? A Systematic Review
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, January 1, 2006; 61(1): 53 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The GerontologistHome page
S. M. Albert, B. Simone, A. Brassard, Y. Stern, and R. Mayeux
Medicaid Home Care Services and Survival in New York City
Gerontologist, October 1, 2005; 45(5): 609 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
Interpreting the results of small trials
Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 1, 2000; 162(10): 1401 - 1401.



Home page
CMAJHome page
H. Bergman and F. Beland
Evaluating innovation in the care of Canada's frail elderly population
Can. Med. Assoc. J., February 1, 2000; 162(4): 511 - 512.
[Full Text] [PDF]