 Advertisement | ||||||||
 | ||||||||
|
||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
|
Michele Preyde is a PhD student in the Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, and a member of the College of Massage Therapists of Ontario, Toronto, Ont.
Background: The effectiveness of massage therapy for low-back pain has not been documented. This randomized controlled trial compared comprehensive massage therapy (soft-tissue manipulation, remedial exercise and posture education), 2 components of massage therapy and placebo in the treatment of subacute (between 1 week and 8 months) low-back pain.
Methods: Subjects with subacute low-back pain were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: comprehensive massage therapy (n = 25), soft-tissue manipulation only (n = 25), remedial exercise with posture education only (n = 22) or a placebo of sham laser therapy (n = 26). Each subject received 6 treatments within approximately 1 month. Outcome measures obtained at baseline, after treatment and at 1-month follow-up consisted of the Roland Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), the McGill Pain Questionnaire (PPI and PRI), the State Anxiety Index and the Modified Schober test (lumbar range of motion).
Results: Of the 107 subjects who passed screening, 98 (92%) completed post-treatment tests and 91 (85%) completed follow-up tests. Statistically significant differences were noted after treatment and at follow-up. The comprehensive massage therapy group had improved function (mean RDQ score 1.54 v. 2.86-6.5, p < 0.001), less intense pain (mean PPI score 0.42 v. 1.18-1.75, p < 0.001) and a decrease in the quality of pain (mean PRI score 2.29 v. 4.55-7.71, p = 0.006) compared with the other 3 groups. Clinical significance was evident for the comprehensive massage therapy group and the soft-tissue manipulation group on the measure of function. At 1-month follow-up 63% of subjects in the comprehensive massage therapy group reported no pain as compared with 27% of the soft-tissue manipulation group, 14% of the remedial exercise group and 0% of the sham laser therapy group.
Interpretation: Patients with subacute low-back pain were shown to benefit from massage therapy, as regulated by the College of Massage Therapists of Ontario and delivered by experienced massage therapists.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. A. C. Machado, S. J. Kamper, R. D. Herbert, C. G. Maher, and J. H. McAuley Analgesic effects of treatments for non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials Rheumatology, May 1, 2009; 48(5): 520 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Little, G. Lewith, F. Webley, M. Evans, A. Beattie, K. Middleton, J. Barnett, K. Ballard, F. Oxford, P. Smith, et al. Randomised controlled trial of Alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage (ATEAM) for chronic and recurrent back pain BMJ, December 12, 2008; 337(aug19_2): a884 - a884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. van Tulder Conservative non-pharmacological treatment for chronic low back pain BMJ, August 19, 2008; 337(aug19_2): a974 - a974. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Chou and L. H. Huffman Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline Ann Intern Med, October 2, 2007; 147(7): 492 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. C.I. Tsao Effectiveness of Massage Therapy for Chronic, Non-malignant Pain: A Review Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., June 1, 2007; 4(2): 165 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. I. Perlman, A. Sabina, A.-L. Williams, V. Y. Njike, and D. L. Katz Massage Therapy for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Randomized Controlled Trial Arch Intern Med, December 11, 2006; 166(22): 2533 - 2538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Hayden, M. W. van Tulder, A. V. Malmivaara, and B. W. Koes Meta-Analysis: Exercise Therapy for Nonspecific Low Back Pain Ann Intern Med, May 3, 2005; 142(9): 765 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Hayden, M. W. van Tulder, and G. Tomlinson Systematic Review: Strategies for Using Exercise Therapy To Improve Outcomes in Chronic Low Back Pain Ann Intern Med, May 3, 2005; 142(9): 776 - 785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. P. Dickinson, L. M. Dickinson, F. V. deGruy, D. S. Main, L. M. Candib, and K. Rost A Randomized Clinical Trial of a Care Recommendation Letter Intervention for Somatization in Primary Care Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2003; 1(4): 228 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Ernst The safety of massage therapy Rheumatology, September 1, 2003; 42(9): 1101 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. C. Cherkin, K. J. Sherman, R. A. Deyo, and P. G. Shekelle A Review of the Evidence for the Effectiveness, Safety, and Cost of Acupuncture, Massage Therapy, and Spinal Manipulation for Back Pain Ann Intern Med, June 3, 2003; 138(11): 898 - 906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Quinn, C. Chandler, and A. Moraska Massage Therapy and Frequency of Chronic Tension Headaches Am J Public Health, October 1, 2002; 92(10): 1657 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Oppel Is massage therapy genuinely effective? Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 1, 2000; 163(8): 953 - 953. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Sedergreen Is massage therapy genuinely effective? Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 1, 2000; 163(8): 953 - 953. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Preyde Is massage therapy genuinely effective? Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 1, 2000; 163(8): 953 - 954. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all eLetters
| HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | HELP | SEARCH |
|
|||||
|
Copyright 1995-2000, Canadian Medical Association. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329
(e) 0820-3946 (p)
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association. |
|||||
