This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Easterbrook, M.
Right arrow Articles by Najgebauer, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Easterbrook, M.
Right arrow Articles by Najgebauer, E.

Canadian Medical Association Journal, Vol 160, Issue 8 1159-1163, Copyright © 1999 by Canadian Medical Association

Research * Recherche

Rural background and clinical rural rotations during medical training: effect on practice location

M. Easterbrook, M. Godwin, R. Wilson, G. Hodgetts, G. Brown, R. Pong and E. Najgebauer

BACKGROUND: Providing health care services in rural communities in Canada remains a challenge. What affects a family medicine resident's decision concerning practice location? Does the resident's background or exposure to rural practice during clinical rotations affect that decision? METHODS: Cross-sectional mail survey of 159 physicians who graduated from the Family Medicine Program at Queen's University, Kingston, Ont., between 1977 and 1991. The outcome variables of interest were the size of community in which the graduate chose to practise on completion of training (rural [population less than 10,000] v. nonrural [population 10,000 or more]) and the size of community of practice when the survey was conducted (1993). The predictor or independent variables were age, sex, number of years in practice, exposure to rural practice during undergraduate and residency training, and size of hometown. RESULTS: Physicians who were raised in rural communities were 2.3 times more likely than those from nonrural communities to choose to practise in a rural community immediately after graduation (95% confidence interval 1.43-3.69, p = 0.001). They were also 2.5 times more likely to still be in rural practice at the time of the survey (95% confidence interval 1.53-4.01, p = 0.001). There was no association between exposure to rural practice during undergraduate or residency training and choosing to practise in a rural community. INTERPRETATION: Physicians who have roots in rural Canada are more likely to practise in rural Canada than those without such a background.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
J. Rourke
Social Accountability in Theory and Practice.
Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2006; 4(suppl_1): S45 - S48.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CMAJHome page
M. Mathews, J. T.B. Rourke, and A. Park
National and provincial retention of medical graduates of Memorial University of Newfoundland.
Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 15, 2006; 175(4): 357 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CMAJHome page
J. Rourke and for The Task Force of the Society of Rural Physici
Strategies to increase the enrolment of students of rural origin in medical school: recommendations from the Society of Rural Physicians of Canada
Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 4, 2005; 172(1): 62 - 65.
[Full Text] [PDF]