This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weijer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Meslin, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weijer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Meslin, E. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Bioethics for Clinicians Series

Canadian Medical Association Journal, Vol 156, Issue 8 1153-1157, Copyright © 1997 by Canadian Medical Association

Review * Synthèse

Bioethics for clinicians: 10. Research ethics

C. Weijer, B. Dickens and E. M. Meslin

Medical research involving human subjects raises complex ethical, legal and social issues. Investigators sometimes find that their obligations with respect to a research project come into conflict with their obligations to individual patients. The ethical conduct of research rests on 3 guiding principles: respect for persons, beneficience, and justice. Respect for persons underlies the duty to obtain informed consent from study participants. Beneficence demands a favourable balance between the potential benefits and harms of participation. Justice requires that vulnerable people not be exploited and that eligible candidates who may benefit from participation not be excluded without good cause. Studies must be designed in a way that ensures the validity of findings and must address questions of sufficient importance to justify the risks of participation. In any clinical trial there must be genuine uncertainty as to which treatment arm offers the most benefit, and placebo controls should not be used if effective standard therapies exist. Researchers have a responsibility to inform themselves about the ethical, legal and policy standards that govern their activities. When difficulties arise, they should consult the existing literature and seek the advice of experts in research ethics.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nurs EthicsHome page
C. Lind, B. Anderson, and K. Oberle
Ethical Issues in Adolescent Consent for Research
Nursing Ethics, September 1, 2003; 10(5): 504 - 511.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Med. EthicsHome page
G Bravo, M Paquet, and M-F Dubois
Knowledge of the legislation governing proxy consent to treatment and research
J. Med. Ethics, February 1, 2003; 29(1): 44 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CMAJHome page
L. Shanner and J. Nisker
Bioethics for clinicians: 26. Assisted reproductive technologies
Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 1, 2001; 164(11): 1589 - 1594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nurs EthicsHome page
J. Kylma, K. Vehvilainen-Julkunen, and J. Lahdevirta
Ethical Considerations in a Grounded Theory Study on the Dynamics of Hope in Hiv-Positive Adults and Their Significant
Nursing Ethics, May 1, 1999; 6(3): 224 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]