Canadian Medical Association Journal, Vol 152, Issue 2 169-173, Copyright © 1995 by Canadian Medical Association
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
Basic statistics for clinicians: 2. Interpreting study results: confidence intervals
G. Guyatt, R. Jaeschke, N. Heddle, D. Cook, H. Shannon and S. Walter
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
In the second of four articles, the authors discuss the "estimation" approach to interpreting study results. Whereas, in hypothesis testing, study results lead the reader to reject or accept a null hypothesis, in estimation the reader can assess whether a result is strong or weak, definitive or not. A confidence interval, based on the observed result and the size of the sample, is calculated. It provides a range of probabilities within which the true probability would lie 95% or 90% of the time, depending on the precision desired. It also provides a way of determining whether the sample is large enough to make the trial definitive. If the lower boundary of a confidence interval is above the threshold considered clinically significant, then the trial is positive and definitive, if the lower boundary is somewhat below the threshold, the trial is positive, but studies with larger samples are needed. Similarly, if the upper boundary of a confidence interval is below the threshold considered significant, the trial is negative and definitive. However, a negative result with a confidence interval that crosses the threshold means that trials with larger samples are needed to make a definitive determination of clinical importance.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  S. Cruz-Flores, R. M. Sugg, and J. C. Grotta MYOCARDIAL INJURY IN PATIENTS WITH INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE TREATED WITH RECOMBINANT FACTOR VIIA Neurology, May 15, 2007; 68(20): 1750 - 1751. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. V. Lochner, M. Bhandari, and P. Tornetta III Type-II Error Rates (Beta Errors) of Randomized Trials in Orthopaedic Trauma J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2001; 83(11): 1650 - 1655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S Wiebe The Principles of Evidence-Based Medicine Cephalalgia, October 1, 2000; 20(2_suppl): 10 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Petrucci, V. M. Ranieri, P. M. Suter, and A. S. Slutsky Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury JAMA, February 23, 2000; 283(8): 1003 - 1004. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. L. V. H. Greenfield, J. E. Kuhn, and E. M. Wojtys A Statistics Primer: Confidence Intervals Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1998; 26(1): 145 - 149. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Greenhalgh How to read a paper: Statistics for the non-statistician. II: "Significant" relations and their pitfalls BMJ, August 16, 1997; 315(7105): 422 - 425. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Greenhalgh How to read a paper: Statistics for the non-statistician. I: Different types of data need different statistical tests BMJ, August 9, 1997; 315(7104): 364 - 366. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. H. Guyatt, D. L. Sackett, J. C. Sinclair, R. Hayward, D. J. Cook, R. J. Cook, Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group, E. Bass, H. Gerstein, B. Haynes, et al. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: IX. A Method for Grading Health Care Recommendations JAMA, December 13, 1995; 274(22): 1800 - 1804. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|