This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hall, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. M.

Canadian Medical Association Journal, Vol 151, Issue 12 1713-1719, Copyright © 1994 by Canadian Medical Association

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Variations in hysterectomy rates in Ontario: does the indication matter?

R. E. Hall and M. M. Cohen
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences in Ontario, North York.

OBJECTIVES: To examine variations in rates of hysterectomy for the five main indications for the procedure in regions of Ontario. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population-based analysis of hospital discharge abstracts. SETTING: All acute care facilities in Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: All 65,599 women whose hospital record contained a procedure code indicating that a hysterectomy was performed between Apr. 1, 1988, and Mar. 31, 1991. Duplicate cases, records of cancelled procedures and nonresidents were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Crude and age-adjusted rates of hysterectomy, by indication, for each region of Ontario. RESULTS: Five indications accounted for more than 80% of hysterectomies performed. The median age-adjusted rate of hysterectomy for Ontario regions during the study period was 6.25 per 1000 women, with a 2.7-fold variation among regions. The regions with rates of hysterectomy in the highest quartile tended to be rural, and those with rates in the lowest quartile tended to be urban areas with teaching hospitals. When rates of hysterectomy for specific indications were examined, they showed substantial variations among regions in the rate of the procedure for menstrual hemorrhage (18-fold variation), uterine prolapse (9.3-fold) and endometriosis (6.3-fold). A smaller but still significant variation was shown in the rate of hysterectomy for leiomyoma (2.3-fold). Regional variation in the rate of hysterectomy for cancer (2.5-fold) was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: There are large interregional variations in rates of hysterectomy, especially for indications that are more discretionary than others (i.e., menstrual hemorrhage, uterine prolapse and endometriosis) and less variation in rates when treatment options and diagnosis are clear-cut. This result suggests the need for more definitive practice guidelines on treatment of the indications for which the rate is more variable.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
T. Bergholt, L. Eriksen, N. Berendt, M. Jacobsen, and J.B. Hertz
Prevalence and risk factors of adenomyosis at hysterectomy
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2418 - 2421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CMAJHome page
E. Weir
The public health toll of endometriosis
Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 1, 2001; 164(8): 1201 - 1201.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W. A. Ghali, A. S. Ash, R. E. Hall, and M. A. Moskowitz
Variation in hospital rates of intraaortic balloon pump use in coronary artery bypass operations
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1999; 67(2): 441 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]