This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosser, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Newell, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosser, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Newell, C.

Canadian Medical Association Journal, Vol 146, Issue 6 911-917, Copyright © 1992 by Canadian Medical Association


CLINICAL TRIAL

Use of reminders to increase compliance with tetanus booster vaccination

W. W. Rosser, B. G. Hutchison, I. McDowell and C. Newell
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Ont.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of three computerized reminder systems on compliance with tetanus vaccination. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Ottawa Civic Hospital Family Medicine Centre. PARTICIPANTS: Of 8069 patients 20 years of age or more who were not in a hospital or institution 5589 were randomly assigned, by family, to a control group, a physician reminder group, a telephone reminder group or a letter reminder group. The remaining 2480 patients were not included in the randomized portion of the study but were monitored. Results are presented for the 5242 randomized patients and the 2369 nonrandomized patients for whom there was no up-to-date record of tetanus vaccination at the start of the trial. INTERVENTIONS: For the patients in the physician reminder group the physician was reminded at an office visit to assess the patient's tetanus vaccination status and to recommend vaccination; those in the other two reminder groups received a telephone call or letter enquiring about their tetanus vaccination status and recommending a booster dose. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of patients who received tetanus toxoid during the study year or who had a claim of vaccination in the previous 10 years. MAIN RESULTS: The rate of recorded tetanus vaccination in the randomized control group was 3.2%. The difference between that rate and those for the three reminder groups was 19.6% in the physician reminder group (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.1% to 22.2%, p less than 0.00001), 20.8% in the telephone reminder group (95% CI 18.3% to 23.5%, p less than 0.00001) and 27.4% in the letter reminder group (95% CI 24.8% to 30.2%, p less than 0.00001)). The letter reminders were more effective than either the telephone reminders (p = 0.00013) or the physician reminders (p less than 0.00001) in improving compliance. The cost to the practice per additional vaccination recorded was 43 for the physician reminders, $5.43 for the telephone reminders and $6.05 for the letter reminders. CONCLUSIONS: Although all three reminder systems increased the rate of recorded tetanus vaccination they fell far short of achieving complete population coverage. More intensive interventions would be required to approach that goal. However, such interventions do not appear to be justified given the rarity of tetanus.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Med Inform AssocHome page
J. W Dexheimer, T. R Talbot, D. L Sanders, S T. Rosenbloom, and D. Aronsky
Prompting Clinicians about Preventive Care Measures: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
JAMIA, May 1, 2008; 15(3): 311 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
B. Kralj, D. Iverson, K. Hotz, and F. D. Ashbury
The Impact of Computerized Clinical Reminders on Physician Prescribing Behavior: Evidence From Community Oncology Practice
American Journal of Medical Quality, September 1, 2003; 18(5): 197 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. A. Medow, T. J. Wilt, S. Dysken, S. D. Hillson, S. Woods, and S. J. Borowsky
Effect of Written and Computerized Decision Support Aids for the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Depression Guidelines on the Evaluation of Hypothetical Clinical Scenarios
Med Decis Making, October 1, 2001; 21(5): 344 - 356.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
P. M. Vivier, A. J. Alario, C. O'Haire, L. M. Dansereau, E. B. Jakum, and G. Peter
The Impact of Outreach Efforts in Reaching Underimmunized Children in a Medicaid Managed Care Practice
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 2000; 154(12): 1243 - 1247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. G. Szilagyi, C. Bordley, J. C. Vann, A. Chelminski, R. M. Kraus, P. A. Margolis, and L. E. Rodewald
Effect of Patient Reminder/Recall Interventions on Immunization Rates: A Review
JAMA, October 11, 2000; 284(14): 1820 - 1827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. G. Demakis, C. Beauchamp, W. L. Cull, R. Denwood, S. A. Eisen, R. Lofgren, K. Nichol, J. Woolliscroft, W. G. Henderson, and for the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative
Improving Residents' Compliance With Standards of Ambulatory Care: Results From the VA Cooperative Study on Computerized Reminders
JAMA, September 20, 2000; 284(11): 1411 - 1416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. S. Shaw, R. C. Samuels, E. M. Larusso, and H. H. Bernstein
Impact of an Encounter-Based Prompting System on Resident Vaccine Administration Performance and Immunization Knowledge
Pediatrics, April 1, 2000; 105(4): 978 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
E. A. Balas, S. Weingarten, C. T. Garb, D. Blumenthal, S. A. Boren, and G. D. Brown
Improving Preventive Care by Prompting Physicians
Arch Intern Med, February 14, 2000; 160(3): 301 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. L. Hunt, R. B. Haynes, S. E. Hanna, and K. Smith
Effects of Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Physician Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review
JAMA, October 21, 1998; 280(15): 1339 - 1346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
T. A. Lieu, A. M. Capra, J. Makol, S. B. Black, H. R. Shinefield, and for the Immunization Message Study Group
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Letters, Automated Telephone Messages, or Both for Underimmunized Children in a Health Maintenance Organization
Pediatrics, April 1, 1998; 101 (4): e3 - e3.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
E. A. Balas, F. Jaffrey, G. J. Kuperman, S. A. Boren, G. D. Brown, F. Pinciroli, and J. A. Mitchell
Electronic Communication With Patients: Evaluation of Distance Medicine Technology
JAMA, July 9, 1997; 278(2): 152 - 159.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Med Inform AssocHome page
R. B Elson, J. G Faughnan, and D. P Connelly
An Industrial Process View of Information Delivery to Support Clinical Decision Making: Implications for Systems Design and Process Measures
JAMIA, July 1, 1997; 4(4): 266 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Fam MedHome page
R. B. Elson and D. P. Connelly
Computerized Patient Records in Primary Care: Their Role in Mediating Guideline-Driven Physician Behavior Change
Arch Fam Med, August 1, 1995; 4(8): 698 - 705.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
E. F. Dini, R. W. Linkins, and M. Chaney
Effectiveness of Computer-Generated Telephone Messages in Increasing Clinic Visits
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, August 1, 1995; 149(8): 902 - 905.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
R. W. Linkins, E. F. Dini, G. Watson, and P. A. Patriarca
A Randomized Trial of the Effectiveness of Computer-Generated Telephone Messages in Increasing Immunization Visits Among Preschool Children
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, September 1, 1994; 148(9): 908 - 914.
[Abstract] [PDF]