This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosser, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Newell, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosser, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Newell, C.

Canadian Medical Association Journal, Vol 145, Issue 7 807-814, Copyright © 1991 by Canadian Medical Association


CLINICAL TRIAL

Use of reminders for preventive procedures in family medicine

W. W. Rosser, I. McDowell and C. Newell
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Ont.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of three computerized reminder systems in the delivery of five preventive procedures in family practice. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Ottawa Civic Hospital Family Medicine Centre. PARTICIPANTS: Of 8502 patients 15 years of age or more who were not in a hospital or institution 5883 were randomly assigned, by family, to a control group, a physician reminder group (passive) or a telephone or letter reminder group (active). The remaining 2619 patients were not included in the randomized portion of the study but were monitored. INTERVENTION: During 1 year the patients in the active reminder groups received a telephone call or letter reminding them of any overdue preventive procedures; for those in the passive reminder group the physician was reminded at an office visit to provide any overdue service. OUTCOME MEASURE: Rates of completion of the preventive procedures required. MAIN RESULTS: All three reminder systems significantly improved the delivery of preventive services (p less than 0.001). The procedure completion rates were 42.0% in the letter reminder group, 42.0% in the telephone reminder group, 33.7% in the physician reminder group and 14.1% in the randomized control group. The use of a letter was more cost-effective than the telephone system, but the physician reminder system was the most cost-effective. CONCLUSION: Computerized reminder systems do improve the delivery of preventive services in family practice.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. W. Dexheimer, T. R. Talbot, D. L. Sanders, S. T. Rosenbloom, and D. Aronsky
Prompting Clinicians about Preventive Care Measures: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2008; 15(3): 311 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
E. K. Wei, C. T. Ryan, A. J. Dietrich, and G. A. Colditz
Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening by Targeting Office Systems in Primary Care Practices: Disseminating Research Results Into Clinical Practice
Arch Intern Med, March 28, 2005; 165(6): 661 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. X. Garg, N. K. J. Adhikari, H. McDonald, M. P. Rosas-Arellano, P. J. Devereaux, J. Beyene, J. Sam, and R. B. Haynes
Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review
JAMA, March 9, 2005; 293(10): 1223 - 1238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
H. J. Schunemann, D. Cook, J. Grimshaw, A. Liberati, J. Heffner, V. Tapson, and G. Guyatt
Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: From Evidence to Application: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3_suppl): 688S - 696S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
P. M. Vivier, A. J. Alario, C. O'Haire, L. M. Dansereau, E. B. Jakum, and G. Peter
The Impact of Outreach Efforts in Reaching Underimmunized Children in a Medicaid Managed Care Practice
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 2000; 154(12): 1243 - 1247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. G. Szilagyi, C. Bordley, J. C. Vann, A. Chelminski, R. M. Kraus, P. A. Margolis, and L. E. Rodewald
Effect of Patient Reminder/Recall Interventions on Immunization Rates: A Review
JAMA, October 11, 2000; 284(14): 1820 - 1827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. G. Demakis, C. Beauchamp, W. L. Cull, R. Denwood, S. A. Eisen, R. Lofgren, K. Nichol, J. Woolliscroft, W. G. Henderson, and for the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative
Improving Residents' Compliance With Standards of Ambulatory Care: Results From the VA Cooperative Study on Computerized Reminders
JAMA, September 20, 2000; 284(11): 1411 - 1416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
E. A. Balas, S. Weingarten, C. T. Garb, D. Blumenthal, S. A. Boren, and G. D. Brown
Improving Preventive Care by Prompting Physicians
Arch Intern Med, February 14, 2000; 160(3): 301 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. L. Hunt, R. B. Haynes, S. E. Hanna, and K. Smith
Effects of Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Physician Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review
JAMA, October 21, 1998; 280(15): 1339 - 1346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
B. Hutchison, S. Birch, C E. Evans, L. J Goldsmith, B. A Markham, J. Frank, and M. Paterson
Screening for hypercholesterolaemia in primary care: randomised controlled trial of postal questionnaire appraising risk of coronary heart disease
BMJ, April 18, 1998; 316(7139): 1208 - 1213.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
D. Wood, M. Schuster, C. Donald-Sherbourne, N. Duan, R. Mazel, and N. Halfon
Reducing Missed Opportunities to Vaccinate During Child Health Visits: How Effective Are Parent Education and Case Management?
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 1998; 152(3): 238 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
E. A. Balas, F. Jaffrey, G. J. Kuperman, S. A. Boren, G. D. Brown, F. Pinciroli, and J. A. Mitchell
Electronic Communication With Patients: Evaluation of Distance Medicine Technology
JAMA, July 9, 1997; 278(2): 152 - 159.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Fam MedHome page
D. J. Madlon-Kay
The Effectiveness of a Mail Reminder System for Depot Medroxyprogesterone Injections
Arch Fam Med, April 1, 1996; 5(4): 234 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
E. A. Boohaker, R. E. Ward, J. E. Uman, and B. D. McCarthy
Patient Notification and Follow-up of Abnormal Test Results: A Physician Survey
Arch Intern Med, February 12, 1996; 156(3): 327 - 331.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. A. Davis, M. A. Thomson, A. D. Oxman, and R. B. Haynes
Changing Physician Performance: A Systematic Review of the Effect of Continuing Medical Education Strategies
JAMA, September 6, 1995; 274(9): 700 - 705.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Fam MedHome page
R. B. Elson and D. P. Connelly
Computerized Patient Records in Primary Care: Their Role in Mediating Guideline-Driven Physician Behavior Change
Arch Fam Med, August 1, 1995; 4(8): 698 - 705.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Fam MedHome page
W. W. Rosser
Preventive Medicine for Adolescents: A Hopeless Cause or a Research Challenge for Family Physicians?
Arch Fam Med, July 1, 1994; 3(7): 579 - 580.
[Abstract] [PDF]