 Advertisement | ||||||||
 | ||||||||
|
||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
Canadian Medical Association Journal, Vol 145, Issue 4 307-311, Copyright © 1991 by Canadian Medical Association
CLINICAL TRIAL |
D. W. Molloy and G. H. Guyatt
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the use of and compliance with a new comprehensive health care directive by residents of a home for the aged and to determine the effect of the directive on the use of health care services. DESIGN: Descriptive study with a before-after design. SETTING: A home for the aged providing residential care to women. PARTICIPANTS: All 119 residents (ages 71 to 103 years, mean age 87.5 years). INTERVENTION: Introduction of a comprehensive health care directive and follow-up at 1 year. OUTCOME MEASURES: Residents' treatment choices, compliance with the directive, number of hospital admissions and length of hospital stay, number of deaths and places where deaths occurred. RESULTS: Ninety (76%) of the residents completed the directive. In the event of reversible life-threatening illness 34, 24, 11 and 21 residents requested supportive, limited, maximum and intensive care respectively. For irreversible illness the numbers were 75, 12, 3 and 0 respectively. In case of cardiac arrest 88% requested that cardiopulmonary resuscitation not be done. In the year before the introduction of the directive there were nine deaths, one in the home and eight in hospitals. In the year after there were 17 deaths, 11 in the home and 6 in hospitals. The mean length of hospital stay was significantly lower in that year than in the year before implementation (p less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This innovative health care directive seems to be feasible, practical and well supported by residents, their families and health care professionals. Further studies are required to establish the generalizability and reproducibility of the data to other elderly people in institutions, to chronically ill patients and to the community at large.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. A. Singer, D. K. Martin, J. V. Lavery, E. C. Thiel, M. Kelner, and D. C. Mendelssohn Reconceptualizing Advance Care Planning From the Patient's Perspective Arch Intern Med, April 27, 1998; 158(8): 879 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. C. Zweig Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in the Nursing Home Arch Fam Med, September 1, 1997; 6(5): 424 - 429. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. S. Fischer, H. R. Alpert, J. D. Stoeckle, and L. L. Emanuel Can Goals of Care Be Used to Predict Intervention Preferences in an Advance Directive? Arch Intern Med, April 14, 1997; 157(7): 801 - 807. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. H. Miles, R. Koepp, and E. P. Weber Advance End-of-Life Treatment Planning Arch Intern Med, May 27, 1996; 156(10): 1062 - 1068. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. J. Cook, G. H. Guyatt, R. Jaeschke, J. Reeve, A. Spanier, D. King, D. W. Molloy, A. Willan, D. L. Streiner, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, et al. Determinants in Canadian Health Care Workers of the Decision to Withdraw Life Support From the Critically Ill JAMA, March 1, 1995; 273(9): 703 - 708. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Terry and S. Zweig Prevalence of Advance Directives and Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Community Nursing Facilities Arch Fam Med, February 1, 1994; 3(2): 141 - 145. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Ashby and M. Wakefield Attitudes to some aspects of death and dying, living wills and substituted health care decision-making in South Australia: public opinion survey for a parliamentary select committee Palliative Medicine, October 1, 1993; 7(4): 273 - 282. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | HELP | SEARCH |
|
|||||
|
Copyright 1995-1991, Canadian Medical Association. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329
(e) 0820-3946 (p)
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association. |
|||||
