This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Battista, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Suissa, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Battista, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Suissa, S.

Canadian Medical Association Journal, Vol 144, Issue 11 1469-1474, Copyright © 1991 by Canadian Medical Association

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Testing various methods of introducing health charts into medical records in family medicine units

R. N. Battista, J. I. Williams, J. Boucher, E. Rosenberg, S. J. Stachenko, J. Adam, C. Levinton and S. Suissa
Department of Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Que.

OBJECTIVE: To test three methods of introducing health charts into the medical records of six family medicine units. DESIGN: Quasi-experiment. PARTICIPANTS: The staff physicians and family medicine residents in all six units and the nurses in two units. INTERVENTIONS: Group 1 (minimal intervention): health charts, a user's guide and one training session. Group 2 (intermediate intervention): same intervention as for group 1 plus two feedback sessions at 3 and 6 months. Group 3 (maximum intervention): same intervention as for group 2 plus promotion of the team concept (nurses were included). The intervention phase lasted from September 1987 to August 1988. OUTCOME MEASURES: The frequency with which the health charts were used, the item scores of each preventive care activity and the overall unit scores. Data were gathered through chart audits at baseline and at the end of the intervention phase. RESULTS: The frequency with which the health charts were used varied from 3.9% to 26.9%. The greatest increases in item scores were observed in the use of mammography (20.0%), counselling on lifestyle (19.4%) and breast examination (17.2%). Although the overall improvement in the unit scores was statistically significant (p less than 0.05) the hypothesis of an increasing gradient of effect across the three intervention groups could not be tested because of the variation in scores across the units. CONCLUSION: Health charts and other similar tools are useful; however, they are not sufficient to change practice behaviours. The support of a "champion" on the health care team might well be a determining factor of success for the delivery of preventive services in primary care practice.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
E. A. Zenni and T. N. Robinson
Effects of Structured Encounter Forms on Pediatric House Staff Knowledge, Parent Satisfaction, and Quality of Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, September 1, 1996; 150(9): 975 - 980.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Fam MedHome page
L. L. Dickey and D. B. Kamerow
Primary Care Physicians' Use of Office Resources in the Provision of Preventive Care
Arch Fam Med, July 1, 1996; 5(7): 399 - 404.
[Abstract] [PDF]