This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frank, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frank, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, M.

Canadian Medical Association Journal, Vol 132, Issue 5 516-518, Copyright © 1985 by Canadian Medical Association

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Influenza vaccination in the elderly: 2. The economics of sending reminder letters

J. W. Frank, L. McMurray and M. Henderson

Reminder letters and follow-up telephone calls were used to increase influenza vaccination acceptance by 273 well elderly registered at an urban community health centre. The net effect of the reminder letters was to increase overall coverage to 43%, from 17% in the previous year. Follow-up telephone calls to patients who had not responded to the letters increased coverage to only 55%. Calculation of costs per additional vaccination given revealed that the use of reminder letters alone was much more cost-effective than follow-up telephone calls in increasing coverage. However, with the current fee-for-service reimbursement by medical care insurance in Ontario, neither means of improving vaccination coverage would result in net practice earnings. The implications for an effective and efficient annual influenza program in Canada are discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AJPHHome page
P. J. Neumann, P. D. Jacobson, and J. A. Palmer
Measuring the Value of Public Health Systems: The Disconnect Between Health Economists and Public Health Practitioners
Am J Public Health, December 1, 2008; 98(12): 2173 - 2180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
F. Ahmed, E. E. Elbasha, B. L. Thompson, J. R. Harris, and V.-P. Sneller
Cost-Benefit Analysis of a New HEDIS Performance Measure for Pneumococcal Vaccination
Med Decis Making, October 1, 2002; 22(5_suppl): S58 - S66.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Intern MedHome page
M. Weaver, J. Krieger, J. Castorina, M. Walls, and S. Ciske
Cost-effectiveness of Combined Outreach for the Pneumococcal and Influenza Vaccines
Arch Intern Med, January 8, 2001; 161(1): 111 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Fam MedHome page
R. D. Kellerman, C. T. Allred, and L. E. Frisch
Enhancing Influenza Immunization: Postcard and Telephone Reminders and the Challenge of Immunization Site Shift
Arch Fam Med, April 1, 2000; 9(4): 368 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Intern MedHome page
N. Fiebach and W. Beckett
Prevention of Respiratory Infections in Adults: Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccines
Arch Intern Med, November 28, 1994; 154(22): 2545 - 2557.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Fam MedHome page
P. Harper and D. J. Madlon-Kay
Adolescent Measles Vaccination: Response Rates to Mailings Addressed to Patients vs Parents
Arch Fam Med, July 1, 1994; 3(7): 619 - 622.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Fam MedHome page
P. G. Harper and D. M. Murray
An Organizational Strategy to Improve Adolescent Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccination in a Low Socioeconomic Population: A Method to Reduce Missed Opportunities
Arch Fam Med, March 1, 1994; 3(3): 257 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
K. J. KEMPER and H. GOLDBERG
Do Computer-Generated Reminder Letters Improve the Rate of Influenza Immunization in an Urban Pediatric Clinic?
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 1993; 147(7): 717 - 718.
[Abstract] [PDF]